8 Common Software Development Life Cycle (SDLC) Methodologies

Relia Software

Relia Software

Waterfall, V-Model, Iterative, Incremental, Spiral, Agile, Lean, and DevOps are common software development life cycle (SDLC) methodologies most engineer teams use.

8 Software Development Life Cycle (SDLC) Methodologies

An SDLC methodology is the specific approach a development team uses through the software development life cycle. Waterfall, Agile, Scrum, and DevOps are all examples. Each one decides how a team moves through development phases differently, for example, in strict sequence, in short repeated cycles, or continuously with heavy automation.

Choosing the right method that fits project objectives and needs depends on an awareness of different SDLC models. This tutorial compares 12 SDLC methodologies side by side, so you can match one to your software project's requirements, team, and risk tolerance.

What is An SDLC Methodology?

An SDLC methodology is a defined framework for organizing the phases of software development, including planning, analysis, design, development, testing, deployment, and maintenance.

Each methodology sets the rules for how a team plans work, how often releases ship, how much documentation the project needs, and how much scope can change once development starts. Waterfall, V-Model, Agile, Lean, Iterative, Spiral, Incremental, and DevOps are common methods, each with special traits and uses.

Model and methodology are also often used interchangeably in practice.

8 Popular SDLC Methodologies

Waterfall Model

The Waterfall Model is one of the oldest approaches to organizing a software project. It breaks development into sequential phases, and each phase must finish before the next one starts. Think of it like water moving downhill: it flows in one direction and doesn't loop back. Once a team moves from design to development, they're not expected to revisit earlier decisions.

The typical phases include:

  • Phase 1: Planning and Requirements Analysis.
  • Phase 2: System Design and Architecture.
  • Phase 3: Development and Coding.
  • Phase 4: Verification and Testing.
  • Phase 5: Deployment.
  • Phase 6: Maintenance.

The Waterfall Methodology is excellent for projects that have well-defined needs and limited flexibility for change. However, its rigidity causes it unsuitable for complex projects with changing requirements. Here are some excellent scenarios for the waterfall method.

  • Create a simple internal business app with defined functions.
  • Build a basic e-commerce website with common functionality.
  • Develop a retail store POS system with business regulations.
The Waterfall Model is the most traditional Software Development Life Cycle (SDLC) methodology.
The Waterfall Model is the most traditional Software Development Life Cycle (SDLC) methodology.

V-Model

The V-Model, also known as the Verification and Validation model, is an extension of the Waterfall model. It underlines the V-shaped lifecycle formed by the parallel relationship of development phases and their related testing phases. Every phase of development has a directly related testing phase that guarantees the integration of validation and verification all through the development process.

The V-Model enhances Waterfall by including verification and validation into every development phase. It fits projects emphasizing quality and dependability. But its rigidity and resource needs make it inappropriate for dynamic or fast-growing applications. Here are some V-model uses:

  • Create safety-critical systems like aviation software or medical tools.
  • Design embedded systems with high-performance criteria.
  • Develop financial solutions that really need security and data integrity.
The V-Model enhances the traditional Waterfall approach by integrating verification and validation at each development stage.
Through integration of verification and validation at every development level, the V-Model improves the conventional Waterfall technique.

Iterative Model

>>  Read more: In-depth Explanation Of Iterative and Incremental Development

The Iterative Model is a software development approach that builds a system incrementally through repeated cycles (iterations). Unlike the Waterfall Model, in which every step must be finished before the next starts, the Iterative Model goes back over phases allowing for modification depending on feedback and changing needs.

The core principle is to break down the project into smaller, manageable iterations. Typically, each iteration includes planning, requirement specification, design, programming, testing, and deployment. User feedback is received and integrated in the the next iteration.

The Iterative Model is ideal for projects with evolving requirements and a need for user involvement. To prevent being stuck in never-ending iterations, though, good planning and scope management are very vital. Here are some popular use cases for Iterative model:

  • Build a new social network site with dynamic features.
  • Create a CMS with an expanding set of features.
  • Build a complicated e-commerce site with dynamic product features.
The Iterative Model builds a system incrementally through repeated cycles (iterations)
The Iterative Model builds a system incrementally through repeated cycles (iterations).

Incremental Model

The Incremental Model divides the system into smaller, manageable increments or parts that are created and delivered in cycles. Users can use useful features early in the process with partial system deployment and early functional component delivery.

It is similar to the Iterative Model but differs in focus. While the Iterative Model improves the product over time, the Incremental Model adds features until the system is complete.

Every increment often follows a mini-waterfall model covering design, planning, development, testing, and deployment. The Incremental Model could be applied, for instance, to build a healthcare management system:

  • Initial Planning and Analysis:
    • Define overall system requirements.
    • Plan the increments and prioritize features.
  • Incremental Development and Delivery:
    • Increment 1:
      • Planning: Identify essential features such as patient registration and appointment scheduling.
      • Development: Develop the patient registration module.
      • Testing: Conduct unit testing on the patient registration module.
      • Delivery: Deploy the system with basic functionality.
      • Evaluation: Collect feedback from healthcare providers.
    • Increment 2:
    • Increment 3:
      • Planning: Add features for billing and insurance processing.
      • Development: Develop billing and insurance modules.
      • Testing: Test the new modules and ensure compatibility with existing features.
      • Delivery: Deploy the system with full billing and insurance processing capabilities.
      • Evaluation: Review system performance and user feedback.

The Incremental Model works well for projects with specified functions and phased deployment. For example:

The Incremental Model is well-suited for projects with clearly defined functionalities and phased deployment needs.
The Incremental Model is well-suited for projects with clearly defined functionalities and phased deployment needs

>> Read more about Healthcare software:

Spiral Model

The Spiral Model is a risk-driven software development process model that combines elements of both iterative and incremental models. It emphasizes continuous risk assessment and iterative refinement through a series of spirals, or cycles, each encompassing four main phases:

  • Planning: Define objectives, identify constraints, and determine alternatives.
  • Risk Analysis: Identify and evaluate risks, develop mitigation strategies, and prototype possible solutions.
  • Engineering: Create and test the next level of the product while implementing recognized solutions.
  • Evaluation: Assess the progress, plan the next iteration, and gather stakeholder feedback.

In short, the Spiral Model emphasizes building prototypes and gathering feedback throughout the development process. Let's look at a Spiral Model-based Large-Scale Enterprise System to learn how it works.

Iteration 1:

  • Planning: Identify basic requirements, such as user management and data storage.
  • Risk Analysis: Assess risks related to data security and scalability.
  • Engineering: Develop a prototype for the user management module.
  • Evaluation: Test the prototype, gather user feedback, and plan the next iteration.

Iteration 2:

  • Planning: Focus on the ability to conduct transactions.
  • Risk Analysis: Determine and reduce the transaction integrity and performance concerns.
  • Engineering: Develop and integrate the transaction processing module.
  • Evaluation: Assess system performance, get feedback, and make plans for future improvements.

The Spiral Model is well-suited for large and complex projects with high-risk factors and need for early user feedback. For instance:

  • Developing a new online banking system with complex security and regulatory requirements.
  • Building a large enterprise software application with constantly evolving functionalities.
  • Creating a medical device with critical safety considerations, where early risk identification is paramount.

>> Read more: Spiral Model vs Waterfall Model: Which Approach to Choose?

The Spiral Model is well-suited for large and complex projects with high-risk factors and need for early user feedback.
The Spiral Model is well-suited for large and complex projects with high-risk factors and need for early user feedback.

Agile Model

The Agile Model is a flexible and iterative approach to software development. Collaboration, customer feedback, and rapid product delivery are the key features of the Agile Model. Through continuous iterations, it adapts to changing requirements and delivers small, incremental improvements.

Scrum and Kanban are the two most common frameworks teams use to run Agile in practice, and they organize the work differently.

  • Scrum structures work into fixed-length sprints, usually one to four weeks, with defined roles and ceremonies.
  • Kanban visualizes work on a board and limits how much work is in progress at once. Tasks move through columns such as To Do, In Progress, and Done, and the team caps how many tasks can sit in each column.

Let’s visualize how Agile method works via a practical example below:

Development of a Mobile Banking App

Sprint 1:

  • Planning: Define and prioritize features such as account balance viewing and transaction history.
  • Development: Implement and test account balance feature.
  • Review: Demonstrate the feature to stakeholders, gather feedback.
  • Retrospective: Discuss what went well and what can be improved.

Sprint 2:

  • Planning: Focus on transaction history feature.
  • Development: Implement and integrate transaction history functionality.
  • Review: Present the updated app to stakeholders, collect feedback.
  • Retrospective: Identify improvements for the next sprint.

The Agile Model is well-suited for projects with evolving requirements, need for rapid feedback, and uncertain technologies. Examples:

  • Developing a mobile app with constantly evolving features based on user feedback.
  • Building a web application where user needs and market demands are constantly changing.
  • Creating a complex software product with a high degree of uncertainty about the final requirements.
The Agile Model is a flexible and iterative approach to software development
The Agile Model is a flexible and iterative approach to software development.

Lean Model

The Lean Model is a software development approach derived from lean manufacturing principles. It focuses on delivering maximum value to the customer by minimizing waste and optimizing processes. 

The core principles of the Lean Model include:

  • Value: Determine what is actually valuable to the client and the company. Concentrate on effectively providing that value.
  • Eliminate Waste: Determine which activities—including those involving time, materials, resources, and effort—do not bring value and eliminate them.
  • Build Quality In: Integrate quality assurance into the development process, preventing defects from the outset, rather than fixing them later.
  • Create Knowledge: Promote continuous learning and knowledge sharing.
  • Defer Commitment: Wait until the last minute to make judgments that cannot be altered.
  • Deliver Fast: Deliver small, incremental releases quickly.
  • Respect People: Encourage cooperation, empower team members, and acknowledge their contributions.
  • Optimize the Whole: Focus on improving the entire workflow, not just individual parts.

Several tools and techniques support the implementation of Lean principles:

  • Value Stream Mapping: Visually map the entire process flow to identify potential areas of waste and inefficiency.
  • Kanban Boards: Visualize workflow stages and limit work in progress (WIP) to improve efficiency.
  • 5S Methodology: A workplace organization system that emphasizes Sort, Set in Order, Shine, Standardize, and Sustain.
  • Kaizen Events: Dedicated brainstorming sessions focused on identifying and eliminating waste within a specific process.
The Lean Model is a software development approach derived from lean manufacturing principles.
The Lean Model is a software development approach derived from lean manufacturing principles.

DevOps Model

The DevOps Model is a software development method that puts together development (Dev) and operations (Ops) teams to make them work better together. Its aims are to improve collaboration, automate processes, and use continuous integration and delivery (CI/CD) to deliver high-quality software faster. Shared tools and streamlined workflows are key to making the development process more efficient.

Look through a practical example of a web application development process based on DevOps:

>> Read more about DevOps:

The DevOps Model is a software development methodology that integrates development (Dev) and operations (Ops) teams.
The DevOps Model is a software development methodology that integrates development (Dev) and operations (Ops) teams.

Below is the comparison table of 8 SDLC methodologies:

MethodApproachFlexibilityDocRelease CadenceIdeal Team SizeBest For
WaterfallLinear, sequentialLowHeavyOne release, at the endAny, well-defined scopeFixed-requirement projects
V-ModelLinear with paired testingLowHeavyOne release, at the endAny, regulated projectsSafety-critical systems
IterativeRepeated refinement cyclesMediumModerateWorking version each cycleMid to largePartly known requirements
IncrementalSequential functional releasesMediumModerateShippable increment each phaseMid to largeEarly partial delivery
SpiralRisk-driven cyclesMediumHeavy, risk-focusedWorking build each loopLarge, complexHigh-risk projects
AgileShort iterative sprintsHighLight to moderateWorking software every sprintSmall to midEvolving requirements
LeanWaste-reduction cyclesHighLightFrequent, short cyclesSmall to midResource-constrained teams
DevOpsContinuous automated deliveryHighLight, automated over writtenContinuous, multiple per dayAny, mature engineering orgFrequent-release products

>> Read more: Product Metrics in Software Engineering: Types, Techniques, Tools

How to Choose the Right SDLC Methodology for Your Project?

The right SDLC methodology depends on 6 factors:

  • Requirement stability: If requirements are fixed and well understood, use Waterfall. If they're only partly known and expected to firm up as work progresses, use Iterative. If they're expected to keep changing throughout the project, use Agile.
  • Regulatory and compliance needs: If the project needs a strict audit trail, such as in medical, aviation, or finance software, use V-Model, which pairs every development phase with a matching test phase before release. Waterfall works too if a paired testing structure isn't required.
  • Project size, complexity, and risk: For large, high-risk projects with unclear technology or a high cost of failure, use Spiral, which builds risk assessment into every cycle. For large projects that can be broken into independent, shippable pieces, use Incremental, so core functionality can ship early while the rest is still being built.
  • Release frequency: If the product needs frequent releases and fast recovery when something breaks, use DevOps on top of whichever methodology governs planning. If the team handles a steady, ongoing stream of work rather than fixed release dates, Lean fits better than a sprint-based structure.
  • Budget and timeline certainty: If the business needs a fixed price and a fixed date, Waterfall predicts both accurately. If scope is likely to shift, Agile adapts but makes forecasting harder.
  • Team experience and availability: Agile needs an experienced team and consistent, active customer input to work well. Waterfall and V-Model rely less on continuous team and customer availability, since most input happens upfront during planning.

Many teams don't pick one methodology and stick to it everywhere. A common pattern is running Waterfall or V-Model for a regulated core system while using Scrum or Kanban for the features built around it, matching the methodology to each part of the project instead of forcing one framework onto all of it.

Final Thoughts

Each SDLC methodology suits a different type of project. The best choice depends mainly on how clear the requirements are, how much change you expect, and how much risk the project carries.

The right SDLC model should match the project’s requirements, team setup, delivery goals, and risk level. A good fit makes development easier to manage and helps the team deliver a more reliable product.

>>> Follow and Contact Relia Software for more information!

  • development