Choosing between Android and iOS is a common challenge when planning a mobile app. Even though the two systems share certain architectural similarities, they are developed and maintained in very distinct ways.
Understanding these differences is important for you to balance cost, timeline, user reach, and long-term growth. This blog compares the key aspects of Android vs iOS development to help you decide which OS platform is the right fit for your mobile app project.
What Is Android vs iOS Development?
Android Development is the creation of software running on the Android operating system developed by Google and used across many devices from different manufacturers. Android apps are commonly written in languages like Kotlin or Java and can be distributed through Google Play or other app stores, depending on business needs.
iOS Development refers to creating apps for Apple mobile devices such as the iPhone, iPad, and iPod Touch using the iOS operating system developed by Apple. These iOS apps are written in coding languages like Swift or Objective-C and must follow Apple’s strict design, security, and review guidelines. Then, the app is published on the App Store for monetization.
>> Read more:
- Top 9 Best iOS App Development Companies in Vietnam
- Top 9 Android App Development Companies In Vietnam
Android vs iOS Market Share in 2025/2026
In 2025, Android dominates globally with roughly 72–75% of the mobile operating system market worldwide, while iOS holds around 25–28% of the global market (source: gs.statcounter.com).
This means about 3 out of every 4 smartphone users worldwide use Android, largely because Android runs on many brands' devices with affordable prices. The platform now has nearly 3.7 billion active devices, compared to about 1.5 billion users on iOS.
In fact, Android has been the leading mobile operating system worldwide since it overtook competitors in 2012, and it has remained the top platform for more than a decade.
Let’s take a closer look at Android vs iOS market share by country and region in 2025:
-
By country:
|
Country |
Android |
iOS |
Winner |
|
United States |
40.42% |
59.31% |
iOS |
|
United Kingdom |
48.73% |
50.76% |
Android |
|
Canada |
38.9% |
60.74% |
iOS |
|
Germany |
54.92% |
44.36% |
Android |
|
Australia |
40.31% |
58.92% |
iOS |
|
China |
77.23% |
22.39% |
Android |
|
Japan |
39.34% |
60.49% |
iOS |
|
South Korea |
73.49 |
26.02% |
Android |
|
India |
95.26% |
4.44% |
Android |
|
Viet Nam |
56.88% |
42.71% |
Android |
-
By region:
|
Region |
Android |
iOS |
Winner |
|
South America |
84.59% |
15.23% |
Android |
|
North America |
41.3% |
58.43% |
iOS |
|
Europe |
60.28% |
39.2% |
Android |
|
Africa |
83.52% |
15.21% |
Android |
|
Asia |
82.34% |
17.34% |
Android |
|
Oceania |
42.69% |
56.48% |
iOS |
In 2026, Android is expected to keep its clear lead in user volume, with around 71% – 74% of the global market and roughly 3.7 to 4.2 billion active users. iOS, meanwhile, continues to lead in the premium segment, holding about 26% – 29% market share with an estimated 1.6 to 1.8 billion users, focusing more on user value than total volume.
Because of this difference, choosing an operating system should depend heavily on your target market.
Android vs iOS Development: Pros and Cons
Android Development
Pros:
- Wider market reach: Android has a much larger global user base than iOS, so businesses can reach more users across multiple countries, especially in Asia, Africa, and emerging markets.
- Flexibility: Android is open-source, which offers more freedom to customize design, system integration, and features, and run on many devices from many manufacturers.
- Lower upfront costs: Android development has a cheaper developer fee ($25 one-time) and works on less expensive hardware, as it is fully compatible with Windows and Linux systems.
- Faster deployment: Android offers faster deployment (within hours or a few days), with a generally quicker and less stringent app submission and review process on Google Play.
Cons:
- Fragmentation: Android runs on thousands of different devices with varying screen sizes, resolutions, and hardware, which takes more time (up to 30-40% more) coding and testing.
- Inconsistent UX: Varying screen sizes, resolutions, and devices can create various designs, which results in less uniform user experiences.
- Lower revenue per user: Android users, on average, tend to use free apps instead of spending on app purchases and subscriptions than iOS users.
- Security risks: The open nature of Android makes it more vulnerable to malware and security threats.
- OS adoption lag: Android users are often slow to adopt the latest OS versions because updates depend on individual manufacturers and carriers.
iOS Development
Pros:
- Higher revenue: iOS users are more willing to pay for apps and make in-app purchases, making it the preferred platform for premium and subscription-based models.
- Controlled ecosystem: Fewer devices and screen sizes to support with strict guidelines mean simpler testing and consistent UI/UX.
- Faster OS adoption: The latest OS version is updated quickly, and developers can frequently add new features, security updates, and APIs without worrying about backward compatibility.
- Security: The closed ecosystem and strict App Store review process ensure high security, data protection, and a generally higher standard of app quality.
Cons:
- Smaller market share: iOS has a smaller global user base than Android, which may limit reach in emerging markets like India, Africa, and South America.
- Higher upfront costs: Developing for iOS requires a Mac computer (MacBook, iMac, or Mac mini) to run Xcode and a $99 annual Apple Developer Program fee.
- Stricter review: Apple's App Store review process is famous for being strict. Apps can be rejected for minor UI inconsistencies, insufficient "lasting value," or bugs, leading to potential launch delays.
- Limited customization: iOS restricts developers from accessing certain hardware features or customizing the OS deep-level functionality.
Android vs iOS Comparison in Mobile App Development
|
Criteria |
Android Development |
iOS Development |
|
Languages |
Kotlin (Modern), Java (Legacy), C++ |
Swift (Modern), Objective-C (Legacy) |
|
IDEs |
Android Studio (Cross-platform: Windows, Mac, Linux) |
Xcode (Mac exclusive) |
|
Complexity |
High |
Low |
|
Time |
Slower |
Faster |
|
Cost |
Higher Total Cost |
Higher Upfront, Lower Long-term |
|
Security |
Open/Variable |
Closed/High |
|
Material Design (customizable, grid-based layouts and deep navigation) |
Human Interface Guidelines (minimalism, fluidity, and depth) | |
|
Monetization |
Ad-based or freemium models. |
High value with subscriptions and in-app purchases. |
|
Maintenance |
Difficult |
Easier |
Languages
Android: Android apps are mainly built with Kotlin and Java. Kotlin is now the preferred choice because it is modern, concise, and reduces boilerplate code. Java still plays a role in legacy systems and large enterprise projects.
iOS: iOS apps are developed using Swift or Objective-C, with Swift being the standard today. Swift is tightly optimized for Apple hardware, which leads to high performance and stability.
>> Explore more:
- 8 Best Android App Development Frameworks For Developers
- Top 15 Mobile App Development Frameworks For Developers
IDEs (Development Environment)
Android: Uses Android Studio built by Google, which is available on Windows, Mac, and Linux. Developers can work with a wide range of hardware setups, including lower-cost machines.
iOS: Requires macOS and Apple hardware to create a controlled but closed development environment. Developers who do not own Apple computers need to invest in Apple hardware before they can start iOS development.
Development Complexity
Android development is more complex because developers must account for thousands of device models from Samsung, Pixel, Xiaomi, etc., each with unique screen sizes, versions, and hardware specs.
iOS development is easier due to a limited number of devices (iPhone and iPad) and strict hardware control. Developers also face fewer "edge case" bugs because behavior is more predictable across devices with a standardized development approach.
Time
Android: Android apps often take longer (often 2-4 months longer) to build and fully stabilize due to the need for extensive device and UI variation testing. However, app updates can be released quickly, iteration cycles are fast, and MVPs can be launched rapidly due to a simpler review process.
iOS: iOS apps are generally faster to build because of a standardized development process and fewer versions of screens and devices to test. But, app review and approval can slow releases and rejections may require design or logic changes.
Cost
Android: Android development is generally costlier because device fragmentation needs more testing and ongoing maintenance. Although Android developers charge lower hourly rates in some regions, QA usually takes 20–25% more time, increasing total app project cost. But, Android has lower upfront costs, with a one-time $25 developer fee and lower hardware requirements.
iOS: iOS development is often cheaper in the long run due to a smaller QA scope, fewer compatibility issues, and lower maintenance effort. Testing on the latest 2–3 iPhone models and one iPad typically covers most users, reducing QA time. However, upfront costs are higher, with a $99 yearly developer fee, the need for Apple hardware, and the higher costs for hiring iOS developers.
Security
Android: Security quality of Android apps depends heavily on implementation. But, Android’s open source nature allows users to install apps from websites or third-party stores, which increases the risk of malware if security is not managed carefully. So, developers need to put extra effort into securing apps across different devices.
iOS: Security in iOS apps is controlled more tightly with app sandboxing, permission controls, and strict review standards. iOS apps are isolated from each other and the core OS, so a malicious app cannot easily steal data from another app.
Some developers can feel uncomfortable with the Apple Store review process, but it keeps the ecosystem more secure and reduces the security burden on developers.
User Experience
Android (Material Design): UX quality can depend on device performance and manufacturer modifications. However, Android allows deep UI customization, flexible navigation patterns and device-specific experiences.
Android users often expect a system-wide Back Gesture (swiping from the side) to work universally. Apps must handle the "back stack" (history of screens) correctly. Also, buttons are often bold, colorful, and adapt to the user's wallpaper colors (Dynamic Color).
iOS (Human Interface): iOS offers highly consistent UI, clear design guidelines, and predictable user behavior. This leads to a more uniform brand experience. Interfaces are expected to use "blur" effects (glassmorphism), thin icons, and large, bold typography. Your iOS app is highly valued if it is consistent with Apple's native apps.
Monetization
Android performs well for:
- Ad-based revenue;
- Freemium models;
- Large-scale user acquisition.
Average user spending is lower, but volume is high.
iOS excels in:
- Subscriptions;
- Paid apps;
- In-app purchases.
Revenue per user is significantly higher in many markets.
Maintenance
Android often has more maintenance challenges like OS fragmentation, device compatibility updates, and long-term QA effort. So, ongoing operational costs can increase significantly.
iOS maintenance is simpler due to fast OS adoption, fewer supported devices, and predictable platform behavior.
How to Choose the Suitable Platform for Your Mobile App?
-
Determining target users: The first step in developing a successful app is to determine who will be your primary users, not just by devices, but by location and demographics. If your users are primarily in North America (US/Canada), Western Europe, or Japan, an iOS app is likely your best pick. If you aim for a global audience or target markets like India, South America, or Africa, Android is more suitable.
-
Considering development costs: Take a serious look at your available budget. iOS can need a higher initial investment, but Android development can actually be more expensive in the long run. Or, if budget is a major constraint, consider cross-platform tools like Flutter or React Native. You can build one app for both platforms, saving 30-40% on initial development costs.
-
Evaluating needed features and performance expectations: Consider the features you want to have in your app, as technology differences can affect platform choice.If your app requires deep access to hardware, file systems, or customization, choose Android. If you want high-performance apps (heavy animation, AR/VR) or high security apps (Fintech, Healthcare), let’s pick iOS.
-
Clarifying monetization strategies: If you want direct revenue via in-app sales and subscription fees, choose iOS. If advertising revenue fits your business model, the massive Android user base may be better.
>> Read more:
- Top 18 Best App Development Companies
- 8 Leading Enterprise App Development Companies in Vietnam
- Top 10 Best Mobile App Development Companies in USA
FAQs
1. How do I compare crypto apps for Android vs iOS?
When comparing crypto apps, the core trading experience (on Coinbase or Binance) is similar on both Android and iOS. The difference is in Web3 and DeFi usage, where platform rules strongly affect what apps can do.
Let's evaluate key factors like security, functionality, and user experience to know clearly their differences:
| Factor | Android | iOS |
| Security | Lower. The ability to install apps from websites can increases the risk of installing malware that drains wallets. | Higher. The closed ecosystem is difficult for fake wallet apps or clipboard hijackers to survive on the App Store. |
| Restrictions | Flexible. Google Play allows full-featured DApp browsers and background processes, making it easier to interact with complex DeFi protocols. |
Strict. Apple's App Store can limit certain crypto apps or require regional account changes. This often breaks "DApp Browsers" inside wallets, you need to use clunky workarounds to connect to decentralized exchanges (like Uniswap). |
| Web3 Access | Strong. You can install browser extensions (like MetaMask or Phantom) directly onto mobile browsers (e.g., Kiwi Browser, Brave). | Limited. Mobile Safari supports some extensions, but interaction with crypto wallets is often rigid. You mostly rely on "WalletConnect" to link apps to sites. |
| Feature Set | Broad Functionality. Versions often feature broader functionality for dApps, advanced trading, and staking directly within the app. | Refined but Limited. Versions often have more refined user interfaces but fewer features. |
| Hardware Wallet Integration | Excellent. Native support for USB-OTG offers the widest compatibility with hardware wallets via USB-C. | Good. Connecting Ledger/Trezor is easier since the move to USB-C (iPhone 15+), but older models need adapters. |
| Performance & UI | Variable. Performance varies significantly depending on the specific device model and specs. | Optimized. Often provides a smoother, more optimized experience with faster updates due to standardized hardware. |
2. Android vs iOS: Which is better for gaming?
The better platform depends on whether you prioritize stability or freedom.
Choose iOS (iPhone) if you want:
- Consistent performance: Apple’s A-series chips deliver faster load times and more stable frame rates because games are optimized for a small, fixed set of hardware.
- Premium titles early: High-end games often launch on iPhone months or years before Android.
- Retro gaming: iOS now supports retro emulators through the App Store, making classic games easy to play without extra setup.
Choose Android if you want:
- Hardcore emulation: Android supports high-end console emulation that iOS restricts due to security rules.
- Gaming-focused hardware: Dedicated gaming phones (like ASUS ROG or RedMagic) offer features iPhones lack: 144Hz+ screens, built-in cooling fans, and shoulder triggers for competitive shooters.
- Cloud gaming: Services like Xbox Game Pass and GeForce Now run as native Android apps and generally perform better than browser-based versions on iOS.
Conclusion
On the ongoing debate of Android vs iOS, there is no a truly winner, only the platform that fits your specific goals. As we move through 2026 with more and more advanced technologies and new mobile app trends, the gap between the two operating systems continues to narrow in terms of features. But, their philosophies remain different, and success lies in choosing the ecosystem that mirrors your target audience and business model.
>>> Follow and Contact Relia Software for more information!
- development companies
- Mobile App Development
- React Native
- coding
- development
- Designing an application
