Unit testing checks individual code in isolation, while integration testing checks whether those code parts still work correctly when they are connected.

Key Differences Between Unit Testing and Integration Testing

large_unit-testing-vs-integration-testing.webp

medium_unit-testing-vs-integration-testing.webp

small_unit-testing-vs-integration-testing.webp

thumbnail_unit-testing-vs-integration-testing.webp

unit-testing-vs-integration-testing.webp

Unit Testing vs Integration Testing: What Are Differences?

Shiplight, Virtuoso, Testim, Mabl, Functionize, AccelQ, testRigor, LambdaTest AI Agents, Testsigma, etc., are leading AI agents in software testing recently.

Top 13 Leading AI Agents in Software Testing For Businesses

large_leading-ai-agents-in-software-testing.webp

medium_leading-ai-agents-in-software-testing.webp

small_leading-ai-agents-in-software-testing.webp

thumbnail_leading-ai-agents-in-software-testing.webp

leading-ai-agents-in-software-testing.webp

Top 13 Best AI Agents in Software Testing For Businesses

<a href="https://reliasoftware.com/blog/what-is-agentic-ai">AI agent</a> is a system that can observe what is happening, make decisions, and take actions on its own instead of following fixed instructions. Because of this, AI agents work well in software testing, where applications change often and need flexible, adaptive testing. They help developers and businesses test faster, cover more real user scenarios, and reduce the time spent writing and maintaining test scripts.
In this article, you&rsquo;ll learn how AI agents in software testing work, the roles they play in modern QA, and best practices for using them effectively. Reading this guide will help you understand when AI agents make sense for your <a href="https://reliasoftware.com/blog/software-testing-life-cycle">software testing process</a> and how they can improve software quality and delivery speed.
&gt;&gt; Read more:&nbsp;
<ul>
<li dir="ltr" style="font-style: italic;" role="presentation">Top 6 Open-source <a href="https://reliasoftware.com/blog/ai-agent-frameworks">AI Agent Frameworks</a></li>
<li dir="ltr" style="font-style: italic;" role="presentation">7 Best <a href="https://reliasoftware.com/blog/golang-ai-agent-frameworks">Golang AI Agent Frameworks</a> You Should Know</li>
</ul>
<h2 dir="ltr" style="text-align: left;">What are AI Agents in Software Testing?</h2>
AI agents in software testing are systems that can automatically determine what to test and execute those tests within an application or software without fixed testing scripts. They act as real testers who analyze the app, create and run test cases, and improve their actions based on past results. They often use Natural Language Processing (NLP) and generative AI to understand text, user flows, and create new test scenarios.
<a href="https://reliasoftware.com/blog/top-automation-testing-tools">Traditional automation testing tools</a> depend on fixed scripts that often break when the app changes, such as when a button moves or a field name is updated. Meanwhile, AI agents use patterns, text, and visual clues to understand what they are testing, so they can still continue their work if the layout changes. This helps QA teams test faster, discover new issues, and keep up with apps that change frequently.
&gt;&gt; Read more: What is <a href="https://reliasoftware.com/blog/automation-testing-functions-tools-cost-and-benefits">Automation Testing</a> in Software Testing?
<h2 dir="ltr" style="text-align: left;">Roles of AI Agent in Software Testing</h2>
<h3 dir="ltr" style="text-align: left;">Automated <a href="https://reliasoftware.com/blog/test-case-design-techniques">Test Case Generation</a></h3>
AI agents can create test cases by using the app like a real user. They click through screens, fill in forms, and try different actions to see how the system works, then turn those actions into test cases. This helps QA teams cover more user flows and edge cases without writing every test manually, and also keeps tests easier to update when the app changes.
<h3 dir="ltr" style="text-align: left;">Intelligent Test Execution</h3>
AI agents execute tests more smartly and efficiently than traditional automation tools. They can run tests 24/7, in parallel, and at any time without manual triggers. Based on recent code changes, past failures, or risk levels, the agent can decide which tests should run first to ensure critical areas are validated early.
This approach helps QA teams shorten test cycles and get faster feedback from each build. Instead of running every test blindly, AI agents focus execution on the most important scenarios, improving reliability while saving time and resources.
<h3 dir="ltr" style="text-align: left;">Adaptive Test Scripts</h3>
Adaptive test scripts, also known as self-healing test scripts, allow AI agents to keep tests working even when the application changes. When a button moves, a field is renamed, or the UI structure is updated, the agent can detect these changes using visual and text clues and automatically adjust the test to match the new structure.&nbsp;
Unlike traditional scripts that break easily, self-healing scripts reduce maintenance effort in fast-moving, agile environments. This helps QA teams spend less time fixing broken tests and more time focusing on improving overall software quality.
&gt;&gt; Read more: How to Write A Powerful <a href="https://reliasoftware.com/blog/test-plan-in-software-testing">Test Plan in Software Testing</a>?
<h3 dir="ltr" style="text-align: left;">Shift-Left Testing</h3>
Shift-left testing is a <a href="https://reliasoftware.com/blog/levels-of-testing-in-software-testing">testing approach</a> where quality checks are done earlier in <a href="https://reliasoftware.com/blog/software-development-life-cycle-sdlc">the software development process</a> instead of waiting until the end. By getting involved from the start, AI agents can review APIs, requirements, or early builds to create and run tests before the full user interface is ready. This helps teams find problems sooner, reduce rework, and keep the product more stable as it grows.
&gt;&gt; Read more:
<ul>
<li dir="ltr" role="presentation">What is <a href="https://reliasoftware.com/blog/what-is-unit-testing">Unit Testing</a>? Definition, Benefits &amp; Process</li>
<li dir="ltr" role="presentation">What is&nbsp;<a href="https://reliasoftware.com/blog/integration-testing">Integration Testing</a>? Example, Approaches, Process</li>
<li>Mastering <a href="https://reliasoftware.com/blog/functional-testing">Functional Testing</a> for Delivering Bug-Free Software</li>
</ul>
<h3 dir="ltr" style="text-align: left;">Visual Testing</h3>
Visual testing checks how an application looks on the screen to make sure the layout, text, and buttons appear correctly. Instead of comparing pixels, AI agents review the screen in a more human way, allowing them to spot issues such as missing content or broken layouts even when small design changes occur.
AI agents can also compare screenshots across different devices, screen sizes, and resolutions to ensure a consistent user experience. This helps QA teams quickly detect UI differences and visual problems without being distracted by minor or expected design updates.
<h3 dir="ltr" style="text-align: left;">Self-Learning and Predictive Analysis</h3>
AI agents improve as they run more tests and collect more results. They learn which parts of the app tend to break and which ones usually work fine, then use that knowledge to decide what to test next. Based on past results, they can focus on risky areas, remove redundant tests, and spot problems earlier before they affect users.
<h3 dir="ltr" style="text-align: left;">Supporting Performance &amp; <a href="https://reliasoftware.com/blog/security-testing-in-software-testing">Security Testing</a></h3>
AI agents can support performance and security testing by running tests under heavy load and risky conditions. They generate different types of traffic, try unusual inputs, and monitor how the application responds. This helps teams find performance issues and security weaknesses that normal tests might not catch.
&gt;&gt; Read more:&nbsp;
<ul>
<li dir="ltr" style="font-style: italic;" role="presentation">Top 7 <a href="https://reliasoftware.com/blog/web-app-security-testing-tools">Web App Security Testing Tools</a> For Developers</li>
<li dir="ltr" style="font-style: italic;" role="presentation">7 Leading <a href="https://reliasoftware.com/blog/performance-testing-tools">Performance Testing Tools</a> for Developers</li>
</ul>
<figure class="image align-center"><img title="Roles of AI Agent in Software Testing" src="https://api.reliasoftware.com/uploads/roles_of_ai_agents_in_software_testing_7bd5b6ebe1.webp" alt="roles of ai agents in software testing" width="1000" height="600">
<figcaption>Roles of AI Agent in Software Testing</figcaption>
</figure>
<h2 dir="ltr" style="text-align: left;">Types of AI Agents in Software Testing</h2>
<h3 dir="ltr" style="text-align: left;">Simple Reflex Agents</h3>
Simple reflex agents act based on fixed rules by checking what is happening on the screen and responding with a set action, such as confirming a button is visible or an error message appears. These agents are useful for basic checks, but they do not remember past actions or learn from experience.
<h3 dir="ltr" style="text-align: left;">Model-Based Reflex Agents</h3>
Model-based reflex agents keep track of both current inputs and past experiences, allowing them to handle more complex scenarios. They use this information to understand how pages and actions are connected, which helps them test complete user journeys such as moving from login to checkout.
<h3 dir="ltr" style="text-align: left;">Goal-Based Agents</h3>
Goal-based agents work toward a specific target, such as completing a signup, placing an order, or reaching a certain page. They choose actions based on what will move them closer to that goal, which makes them useful for testing full user flows and making sure important tasks in the app work from start to finish.
This approach is also widely used in multi-step workflows like&nbsp;<a href="https://www.ai-bees.io/post/ai-appointment-setting">AI appointment setting</a>, where an AI agent can qualify a lead, check available time slots, schedule the meeting, and send follow-up reminders without requiring a human to manage each step.
<h3 dir="ltr" style="text-align: left;">Utility-Based Agents</h3>
Utility-based agents choose actions based on how useful each option is. They compare different paths in the application and pick the one that gives the best result, such as higher test coverage or lower risk. This helps them focus on the most valuable areas to test instead of just following one fixed route.
<h3 dir="ltr" style="text-align: left;">Learning Agents</h3>
Learning agents are AI agents that improve by learning from past tests. They track what fails and what stays stable, then adjust how they test based on that experience. Over time, this helps them make better testing decisions and work more effectively.
<figure class="image align-center"><img title="Types of AI Agents in Software Testing" src="https://api.reliasoftware.com/uploads/types_of_ai_agents_in_software_testing_a85f664df6.webp" alt="types of ai agents in software testing" width="1000" height="600">
<figcaption>Types of AI Agents in Software Testing</figcaption>
</figure>
<h2 dir="ltr" style="text-align: left;">Advantages Of AI Agents in Software Testing</h2>
<ul>
<li dir="ltr" role="presentation">Faster release cycles: AI agents automate and adapt test execution, helping teams shorten testing phases and deliver software more quickly.</li>
<li dir="ltr" role="presentation">Broader coverage: It can explore a wider range of scenarios and edge cases that human testers might miss.</li>
<li dir="ltr" role="presentation">Improved accuracy: Consistently follow testing rules and analyze results carefully, helping reduce human errors and false test failures.</li>
<li dir="ltr" role="presentation">Lower costs: Automating repetitive tasks and finding bugs earlier in the process leads to significant cost savings.</li>
<li dir="ltr" role="presentation">Better use of QA resources: AI agents allow QA teams avoid wasted time and effort on repetitive work and fixing tests, and more time on quality planning and confident releases.</li>
</ul>
<h2 dir="ltr" style="text-align: left;">Best Practices for Implementing AI Agents in Software Testing</h2>
Start Small First
You should start by using AI agents on a small set of tests or in test environments instead of applying them to the whole app at once. This helps teams see how the agents work, manage risks, and avoid issues in production. Once the results are reliable, the agents can be expanded to more parts of the application.
Prioritize Data Quality
AI agents depend on data to work, so data quality is very important. Teams should ensure to use clean, realistic test data that reflects real user behavior and common scenariosto train the agents effectively from day one. Good data helps AI agents make better testing decisions, find real issues, and produce more reliable results from the start.
Set Clear Boundaries and Rules
Teams should clearly specify which parts of the application the AI agent can access, what actions it is allowed to perform, and when it should stop testing. These boundaries help keep testing safe and aligned with business goals.
Monitor Agent Behavior
It is important for teams to monitor both test results and how the AI agent behaves during testing, including its actions and decisions. Regular review and adjustment help ensure the agent stays focused on high-risk areas and continues to deliver reliable value as the application changes.
Combine AI Agents with Human Oversight
AI agents are effective at running and exploring tests, but human review is still essential. QA teams should review critical test flows and important findings to ensure results make sense and meet quality expectations.
Choose the Right Tools
Consider using platforms with pre-built AI agents, such as those available from LambdaTest or ACCELQ, rather than building from scratch. These tools help teams get started faster, reduce setup effort, and fit more easily into existing testing workflows, allowing QA teams to focus on improving test quality instead of building and maintaining AI systems.
<h2 dir="ltr" style="text-align: left;">Challenges of AI Agents in Software Testing</h2>
<ul>
<li dir="ltr" role="presentation">Dependence on data quality: Inaccurate or insufficient data can limit the effectiveness of AI-driven testing decisions.</li>
<li dir="ltr" role="presentation">Reduced predictability: Non-deterministic behavior may make test outcomes harder to reproduce and audit.</li>
<li dir="ltr" role="presentation">Limited transparency: Understanding how an AI agent reached a decision can be challenging, which may affect trust and compliance.</li>
<li dir="ltr" role="presentation">Governance and security concerns: Enterprises must ensure proper controls to prevent unintended actions, data leakage, or compliance issues.</li>
</ul>
<h2 dir="ltr" style="text-align: left;">FAQs</h2>
1. Can AI agents replace human QA testers?
No. AI agents help QA teams but do not replace people. They handle repetitive and large-scale testing, while humans are still needed for test planning, business logic checks, and decision-making.
&gt;&gt; Read more: <a href="https://reliasoftware.com/blog/will-ai-replace-software-engineers">Will AI Replace Software Engineers Altogether</a>?
2. How do teams check if AI agent results are reliable?
Teams review test logs, compare results across different runs, and manually check important test flows. Clear rules and human review are often used for critical areas.
3. Do AI agents work with <a href="https://reliasoftware.com/blog/5-best-practices-for-enhancing-ci-cd-pipeline-security">CI/CD pipelines</a>?
Yes. AI agents can be added to CI/CD pipelines to run tests on new builds, focus on risky changes, and give faster feedback during development.
4. Are AI agents safe to use in enterprise or regulated environments?
They can be, if proper controls are in place. Many enterprises use clear rules, audit logs, and human oversight to meet security and compliance needs.
5. What is the difference between using AI to help testing and testing an AI agent?
Using AI to help with testing means using AI features to test a normal application. Testing an AI agent means checking how the agent itself makes decisions, learns, and reacts to different situations over time.
6. What is the difference between <a href="https://reliasoftware.com/blog/ai-in-software-testing">AI in software testing</a> and AI agents in software testing?
AI in software testing means using AI to assist certain testing tasks while people still control the overall process. AI agents in software testing go a step further by acting like testers themselves, deciding what to test, taking actions on their own, and learning from past test runs.
<h2 dir="ltr" style="text-align: left;">Conclusion</h2>
AI agents in software testing are becoming an important part of modern QA as applications grow more complex and change more quickly. They help development teams conduct tests more efficiently, reduce maintenance effort, and improve overall test coverage.
Using AI agents in software testing is not about replacing human testers, but about supporting developers and businesses with smarter and more flexible testing approaches. When applied with clear rules, oversight, and best practices, AI agents can significantly improve software quality and help teams deliver reliable products faster.
&gt;&gt;&gt; Follow and Contact <a href="https://reliasoftware.com/">Relia Software</a> for more information!

AI agents in software testing are systems that can automatically determine what to test and execute those tests inside an application without any test scripts.

AI Agents in Software Testing: Roles, Types & Best Practices

large_ai-agents-in-software-testing.webp

medium_ai-agents-in-software-testing.webp

small_ai-agents-in-software-testing.webp

thumbnail_ai-agents-in-software-testing.webp

ai-agents-in-software-testing.webp

A Practical Guide to AI Agents in Software Testing

Prototype testing is the process of checking an early version of a software product, known as a prototype, to find and fix issues before creating the final version.

What is Prototype Testing? Methods & Testing Guide

large_prototype-testing.webp

medium_prototype-testing.webp

small_prototype-testing.webp

thumbnail_prototype-testing.webp

prototype-testing.webp

A Practical Guide to Prototype Testing in Software Development

When testing software, it's successful when all the individual components connect and work as a whole. To achieve that, developers use integration testing - an important step to ensure those connections are smooth, reliable, and ready for use. This blog will explore what integration testing is, its approaches, benefits, and more.&nbsp;
&gt;&gt; Read more: <a href="https://reliasoftware.com/blog/importance-of-software-testing">Exploring the Importance of Software Testing: 5 Key Benefits</a>
<h2 dir="ltr">What is Integration Testing?&nbsp;</h2>
Integration testing is a <a href="https://reliasoftware.com/blog/software-testing-life-cycle">software testing process</a> that checks how individual modules or components of an application work together as a group. Its goal is to find and fix defects in the interactions between these components, such as incorrect data exchanges, API mismatches, or interface issues. Thus, the system is more reliable and seamless.
Integration testing happens after unit testing and before validation testing. It groups modules that are passed <a href="https://reliasoftware.com/blog/what-is-unit-testing">unit testing</a> into larger sets, and applies predefined test cases from the integration test plan to those groups. The output is then passed on for system integration.&nbsp;
<h2 dir="ltr">Integration Testing Example</h2>
You&rsquo;re developing an <a href="https://reliasoftware.com/blog/why-e-commerce-businesses-necessitate-a-mobile-application">e-commerce application</a> with the following modules:
<ul>
<li dir="ltr" role="presentation">User Authentication Module: Handles user login and registration.</li>
<li dir="ltr" role="presentation">Product Catalog Module: Shows product details and categories.</li>
<li dir="ltr" role="presentation">Shopping Cart Module: Lets users add items and view totals.</li>
<li dir="ltr" role="presentation"><a href="https://reliasoftware.com/blog/payment-gateway-integration">Payment Gateway Module</a>: Processes payments through third-party services.</li>
</ul>
Test Case: Test if a user can log in, add items to their cart, and successfully complete a payment.
Steps:
<ol>
<li dir="ltr" role="presentation">Log In: The user logs in using valid credentials. This triggers the authentication module, which generates a session token and passes it to other modules.</li>
<li dir="ltr" role="presentation">Add to Cart: The logged-in user picks a product from the catalog, and the product details (e.g., price, ID) are sent to the shopping cart module.</li>
<li dir="ltr" role="presentation">Checkout: The cart calculates the total and sends it to the payment gateway.</li>
<li dir="ltr" role="presentation">Payment: The payment gateway processes the amount and sends back a success or failure response.</li>
</ol>
Expected Outcome:
<ul>
<li dir="ltr" role="presentation">The session token is passed correctly between modules.</li>
<li dir="ltr" role="presentation">Product details are accurately added to the cart.</li>
<li dir="ltr" role="presentation">The payment gateway processes the correct total amount.</li>
<li dir="ltr" role="presentation">The payment is processed successfully, and the order is confirmed.</li>
</ul>
Issues Can be Found:
<ul>
<li dir="ltr" role="presentation">&nbsp;The session isn&rsquo;t passed correctly, so the cart doesn&rsquo;t update.</li>
<li dir="ltr" role="presentation">The product price in the catalog doesn&rsquo;t match the cart total.</li>
<li dir="ltr" role="presentation">The payment fails because the data sent to the gateway is incomplete.</li>
</ul>
<h2 dir="ltr">Why is Integration Testing Important?</h2>
Although each module is passed ịn unit testing, it&rsquo;s still necessary to do integration tests for the following reasons:
<ul>
<li dir="ltr">Different Coding Styles: Every developer has their own way of writing code. When modules from different developers are combined, these differences can create bugs.&nbsp;</li>
<li dir="ltr">Changes in Requirements: Clients often update their requirements during development. When one module is adjusted to meet new needs, it can affect how it interacts with others. Unit testing often misses these issues.</li>
<li dir="ltr">Problems with Data Transfer: As data moves between modules, it can sometimes get lost, formatted incorrectly, or end up in the wrong place. Integration testing makes sure data flows smoothly between different parts of the system.</li>
<li dir="ltr">Issues with APIs and Third-Party Services: Many systems rely on external APIs or tools. If there&rsquo;s a mismatch in how they exchange data, it can cause errors. Use integration testing to make services work well with the rest of the software.</li>
<li dir="ltr">Unfinished Interfaces or Databases: At the integration stage, some modules might not have fully developed interfaces or complete database connections. This can cause errors when they try to interact.</li>
<li dir="ltr">System-Level Compatibility: Sometimes, a module isn&rsquo;t fully compatible with the overall system setup. Integration testing checks that everything fits into the system as a whole.</li>
<li dir="ltr">Missed Error Handling: Developers plan for certain errors, but they can&rsquo;t predict every issue until the modules are connected. Integration testing helps find unhandled problems and improves error handling across the system.</li>
<li dir="ltr">Hardware-Software Issues: If the software interacts with hardware, there can be problems like incompatible drivers or data not being processed correctly.</li>
</ul>
<h2 dir="ltr">Integration Testing Approaches</h2>
<h3 dir="ltr">Big Bang Integration</h3>
Big Bang Integration integrates all modules or components of a system and tests at once as a single integrated unit. In this approach, integration testing just begins when all individual modules are fully developed.
How It Works:
<ol>
<li dir="ltr" role="presentation">All the modules are developed independently and then brought together at once.</li>
<li dir="ltr" role="presentation">After integration, the system is tested as a whole using predefined test cases.</li>
</ol>
Advantages:
<ul>
<li dir="ltr" role="presentation">Ideal for smaller systems with fewer modules and their interactions are simple.</li>
<li dir="ltr" role="presentation">Less time is spent on planning or setting up cause all modules are integrated and tested at the same time.</li>
</ul>
Disadvantages
<ul>
<li dir="ltr" role="presentation">It&rsquo;s challenging to define the exact module or interaction causing the problem if the test fails.</li>
<li dir="ltr" role="presentation">The entire integration process gets delayed if one module is not ready.</li>
<li dir="ltr" role="presentation">Waiting for all modules to be ready means errors are found later, making them harder to fix.</li>
<li dir="ltr" role="presentation">Minor issues in the interface or interactions might be overlooked during testing.</li>
<li dir="ltr" role="presentation">For big projects with many interconnected modules, this approach often leads to more errors and complexity.</li>
</ul>
<figure class="image align-center"><img src="https://api.reliasoftware.com/uploads/big_bang_integration_5045ad8fdb.webp" alt="Big Bang Integration integrates all modules or components of a system and tests at once " width="689" height="413">
<figcaption>Big Bang Integration integrates all modules or components of a system and tests at once.</figcaption>
</figure>
<h3 dir="ltr">Incremental Integration</h3>
Incremental Integration is a testing approach where modules are integrated and tested in small, logical groups, rather than integrating all modules at once. Here&rsquo;s how it work:
<ul>
<li dir="ltr" role="presentation">2 or more modules that are closely related or interdependent are grouped together.</li>
<li dir="ltr" role="presentation">These grouped modules are integrated and tested to make sure they work well with each other.</li>
<li dir="ltr" role="presentation">After the initial group is tested, additional modules are gradually added to the integrated group. Each time new modules are added, the entire integrated system is retested to check for errors or compatibility issues.</li>
<li dir="ltr" role="presentation">This process ends when all modules in the system have been integrated and successfully tested together.</li>
</ul>
This approach uses stubs and drivers, which are temporary tools that help test modules that aren&rsquo;t fully developed yet:
<ul>
<li dir="ltr" role="presentation">Stub: Simulates a module that is called by the module being tested. It provides mock responses without implementing the full logic.&nbsp;</li>
<li dir="ltr" role="presentation">Driver: Simulates a module that calls the module being tested, sending inputs and triggering functionality to validate its behavior.</li>
</ul>
Advantages:
<ul>
<li dir="ltr" role="presentation">Bugs are detected early, thereby reducing the cost and effort.</li>
<li dir="ltr" role="presentation">Testing in small groups is easier to isolate and resolve issues.</li>
<li dir="ltr" role="presentation">Testing can begin as soon as a few modules are ready without delays by waiting for all modules to be completed.</li>
<li dir="ltr" role="presentation">Ideal for complex systems with many interdependent modules.</li>
</ul>
Disadvantages:
<ul>
<li dir="ltr" role="presentation">Additional code is required to simulate incomplete modules, leading to longer development time.</li>
<li dir="ltr" role="presentation">Take longer compared to combining all modules at once.</li>
</ul>
Types of Incremental Integration:
<div dir="ltr" align="left">
<table style="border-collapse: collapse; width: 97.2147%; margin-left: auto; margin-right: auto; border: 1px solid rgb(0, 0, 0);" border="1"><colgroup><col style="width: 17.2225%;" width="115"><col style="width: 27.7782%;" width="163"><col style="width: 28.7058%;" width="177"><col style="width: 26.4801%;" width="169"></colgroup>
<tbody>
<tr>
<td style="border-color: rgb(0, 0, 0); text-align: center;">
Type
</td>
<td style="border-color: rgb(0, 0, 0); text-align: center;">
Top-Down Integration
</td>
<td style="border-color: rgb(0, 0, 0); text-align: center;">
Bottom-Up Integration
</td>
<td style="border-color: rgb(0, 0, 0); text-align: center;">
Hybrid (Sandwich) Integration
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td style="border-color: rgb(0, 0, 0); text-align: center;">
Definition
</td>
<td style="border-color: rgb(0, 0, 0);">
Testing begins with the top-level (parent) modules and moves downward to the lower-level (child) modules.
</td>
<td style="border-color: rgb(0, 0, 0);">
Testing starts with the lowest-level (child) modules and progresses upward to the top-level (parent) modules.
</td>
<td style="border-color: rgb(0, 0, 0);">
Combines top-down and bottom-up approaches. Focus on 3 layers: Top (UI), Middle (business logic), and Bottom (database).
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td style="border-color: rgb(0, 0, 0); text-align: center;">
How it Works
</td>
<td style="border-color: rgb(0, 0, 0);">
<ul>
<li dir="ltr" role="presentation">Use stubs to simulate lower-level modules.</li>
<li dir="ltr" role="presentation">Gradually integrate child modules and retest.</li>
</ul>
</td>
<td style="border-color: rgb(0, 0, 0);">
<ul>
<li dir="ltr" role="presentation">Use drivers to mimic higher-level modules.</li>
<li dir="ltr" role="presentation">Incrementally combine higher-level modules and test.</li>
</ul>
</td>
<td style="border-color: rgb(0, 0, 0);">
<ul>
<li dir="ltr" role="presentation">Test top and bottom layers in parallel using stubs and drivers.</li>
<li dir="ltr" role="presentation">Integrate and test the middle layer before final system-wide testing.</li>
</ul>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td style="border-color: rgb(0, 0, 0); text-align: center;">
Pros
</td>
<td style="border-color: rgb(0, 0, 0);">
<ul>
<li dir="ltr" role="presentation">Tests top-level functions and workflows early.</li>
<li dir="ltr" role="presentation">Focuses on user interface and design first.</li>
</ul>
</td>
<td style="border-color: rgb(0, 0, 0);">
<ul>
<li dir="ltr" role="presentation">Finds issues in backend or low-level modules early.</li>
<li dir="ltr" role="presentation">Ensures strong foundation before testing higher levels.</li>
</ul>
</td>
<td style="border-color: rgb(0, 0, 0);">
<ul>
<li dir="ltr" role="presentation">Finds issues in both high and low layers early.</li>
<li dir="ltr" role="presentation">Works well for layered systems. -&nbsp;</li>
</ul>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td style="border-color: rgb(0, 0, 0); text-align: center;">
Cons
</td>
<td style="border-color: rgb(0, 0, 0);">
<ul>
<li dir="ltr" role="presentation">Needs stubs to replace missing lower modules.</li>
<li dir="ltr" role="presentation">Might miss low-level issues early on.</li>
</ul>
</td>
<td style="border-color: rgb(0, 0, 0);">
<ul>
<li dir="ltr" role="presentation">Needs drivers to simulate missing top modules.</li>
<li dir="ltr" role="presentation">High-level problems might show up later.</li>
</ul>
</td>
<td style="border-color: rgb(0, 0, 0);">
<ul>
<li dir="ltr" aria-level="1">
Needs both stubs and drivers.&nbsp;
</li>
<li dir="ltr" role="presentation">Testing multiple parts at once is harder to manage.</li>
<li dir="ltr" role="presentation">May be costly due to infrastructure setup and maintenance.</li>
</ul>
</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<figure class="image align-center"><img src="https://api.reliasoftware.com/uploads/incremental_integration_9641ac5bf1.webp" alt="Types of Incremental Integration" width="787" height="472">
<figcaption>Types of Incremental Integration</figcaption>
</figure>
</div>
<h2 dir="ltr">How to Implement Integration Testing?</h2>
Before implementing integration testing, make sure all the modules are unit tested. Then, follow these steps:
Review the <a href="https://reliasoftware.com/blog/test-plan-in-software-testing">Test Plan</a>
<ul>
<li dir="ltr" role="presentation">Choose testing approach (Top-Down, Bottom-Up, Hybrid, or Big Bang).</li>
<li dir="ltr" role="presentation">Identify the modules to test and their dependencies.</li>
</ul>
Set Up the Testing Environment
<ul>
<li dir="ltr" role="presentation">Prepare the tools, hardware, and software needed for testing.</li>
<li dir="ltr" role="presentation">Create stubs and drivers if needed.</li>
</ul>
Create Test Scenarios and Cases
<ul>
<li dir="ltr" role="presentation">Write test scenarios that focus on how the modules interact.</li>
<li dir="ltr" role="presentation"><a href="https://reliasoftware.com/blog/test-case-design-techniques">Make detailed test cases</a> to check data flow, error handling, and connections between modules.</li>
<li dir="ltr" role="presentation">Prepare test scripts if using <a href="https://reliasoftware.com/blog/top-automation-testing-tools">automated tools</a>.</li>
</ul>
Run the Tests
<ul>
<li dir="ltr" role="presentation">Combine and test modules step by step based on the plan.</li>
<li dir="ltr" role="presentation">Record any bugs or problems found during testing.</li>
</ul>
Fix and Retest Issues
<ul>
<li dir="ltr" aria-level="1">
Report the issues to developers, have them fixed, and retest to confirm the fixes work.
</li>
</ul>
Test All Scenarios
<ul>
<li dir="ltr" aria-level="1">
Keep testing all the remaining cases to ensure every module interaction is covered.
</li>
</ul>
Do Final System Integration Testing
<ul>
<li dir="ltr" aria-level="1">
Test the fully integrated system to ensure all parts work smoothly together.
</li>
</ul>
&gt;&gt;&nbsp;Read more:
<ul>
<li>Detailed Explanation of 7 <a href="https://reliasoftware.com/blog/software-testing-principles">Software Testing Principles</a></li>
<li><a href="https://reliasoftware.com/blog/manual-testing-vs-automation-testing">Manual Testing vs Automation Testing</a>: Which is Better?</li>
</ul>
<h2 dir="ltr">Conclusion</h2>
Integration testing is crucial to make all parts of a system work well together. By planning carefully, testing step-by-step, and fixing issues early, it helps create a reliable and smooth-running product. Besides, choosing an integration testing approach also saves time, reduces costs, and improves user experience because problems are all caught before the system is fully deployed.
&gt;&gt;&gt; Follow and Contact <a href="https://reliasoftware.com/">Relia Software</a> for more information!

Integration testing is a software testing process that checks how individual modules or components of an application work together as a group.

What is Integration Testing in Software Engineering? | Relia Software

What is Integration Testing? Example, Approaches, Process

large_integration-testing.webp

medium_integration-testing.webp

small_integration-testing.webp

thumbnail_integration-testing.webp

integration-testing.webp

In software development, quality isn’t just about finding and fixing bugs—it’s about building strong processes to prevent issues and meet user expectations. Quality Assurance (QA) and Quality Control (QC) thus become helpful. While often confused, QA and QC have their own roles: QA creates a process to prevent problems, while QC catches and fixes issues in the final product.In this article, I’ll explain the difference between QA and QC, how they help create quality software, and how they work together to keep users happy.<h2>What is QA (Quality Assurance)?</h2>Quality Assurance (QA) is a proactive approach to prevent defects from being introduced during <a href="https://reliasoftware.com/blog/software-development-life-cycle-sdlc">the software development lifecycle</a>. It sets up processes, standards, and guidelines that the whole team understands and follows from the beginning, keeping everything on track.QA teams start working on a project early on and stay engaged throughout development. They work closely with developers to review requirements, design documents, and code. They also assess risks and do early checks to catch issues before they become bigger problems.<figure class="image"><img src="https://api.reliasoftware.com/uploads/quality_assurance_96912dfd70.webp" alt="Quality Assurance (QA) is a proactive approach"><figcaption>Quality Assurance (QA) is a proactive approach. (Source: Freepik)</figcaption></figure><h2>What is QC (Quality Control)?</h2>Quality Control (QC) is a reactive approach used to find and fix bugs that might not have been caught during development. QC tests the software to ensure it works as expected and is defects-free.&nbsp;QC teams usually step in once development is complete, <a href="https://reliasoftware.com/blog/test-case-design-techniques">running test cases</a>, analyzing results, and reporting any issues back to the developers for fixing. They may also run regression tests to make sure new changes don’t cause new issues.<figure class="image"><img src="https://api.reliasoftware.com/uploads/quality_control_75b05a45dd.webp" alt="Quality Control (QC) is a reactive approach"><figcaption>Quality Control (QC) is a reactive approach. (Source: Freepik)</figcaption></figure><h2>Key Differences Between QA and QC in Software Testing</h2>Before diving into the details, this table quickly highlights the main differences between QA and QC:<figure class="table" style="height:621.8px;width:89.993%;"><table style="border-color:rgb(0, 0, 0);border-style:solid;"><tbody><tr><td style="border-color:rgb(0, 0, 0);height:47.6px;text-align:center;">Aspect</td><td style="border-color:rgb(0, 0, 0);height:47.6px;text-align:center;">Quality Assurance (QA)</td><td style="border-color:rgb(0, 0, 0);height:47.6px;text-align:center;">Quality Control (QC)</td></tr><tr><td style="border-color:rgb(0, 0, 0);height:47.6px;text-align:center;">Objective</td><td style="border-color:rgb(0, 0, 0);height:47.6px;text-align:center;">Prevent defects</td><td style="border-color:rgb(0, 0, 0);height:47.6px;text-align:center;">Find and fix defects</td></tr><tr><td style="border-color:rgb(0, 0, 0);height:47.6px;text-align:center;">Approach</td><td style="border-color:rgb(0, 0, 0);height:47.6px;text-align:center;">Proactive (verification)</td><td style="border-color:rgb(0, 0, 0);height:47.6px;text-align:center;">Reactive (validation)</td></tr><tr><td style="border-color:rgb(0, 0, 0);height:47.6px;text-align:center;">Focus</td><td style="border-color:rgb(0, 0, 0);height:47.6px;text-align:center;">Process improvement</td><td style="border-color:rgb(0, 0, 0);height:47.6px;text-align:center;">Product testing</td></tr><tr><td style="border-color:rgb(0, 0, 0);height:47.6px;text-align:center;">Timing</td><td style="border-color:rgb(0, 0, 0);height:47.6px;text-align:center;">Throughout SDLC</td><td style="border-color:rgb(0, 0, 0);height:47.6px;text-align:center;">After development (STLC)</td></tr><tr><td style="border-color:rgb(0, 0, 0);height:86.8px;text-align:center;">Team Involvement</td><td style="border-color:rgb(0, 0, 0);height:86.8px;">Various stakeholders (Project managers, developers, product owner, etc.)</td><td style="border-color:rgb(0, 0, 0);height:86.8px;">Testing team, sometimes end-users in acceptance testing.</td></tr><tr><td style="border-color:rgb(0, 0, 0);height:86.8px;text-align:center;">Tasks</td><td style="border-color:rgb(0, 0, 0);height:86.8px;">Sets standards, reviews requirements, audits processes, risk assessment</td><td style="border-color:rgb(0, 0, 0);height:86.8px;">Executes test cases, analyzes results, reports and retests defects</td></tr><tr><td style="border-color:rgb(0, 0, 0);height:47.6px;text-align:center;">Time Usage</td><td style="border-color:rgb(0, 0, 0);height:47.6px;text-align:center;">Ongoing, mainly early stages</td><td style="border-color:rgb(0, 0, 0);height:47.6px;text-align:center;">Primarily near project end</td></tr><tr><td style="border-color:rgb(0, 0, 0);height:86.8px;text-align:center;">Tools</td><td style="border-color:rgb(0, 0, 0);height:86.8px;">Process and code quality tools (e.g., Jira, SonarQube)</td><td style="border-color:rgb(0, 0, 0);height:86.8px;">Testing and defect tracking tools (e.g., Selenium, Postman, Bugzilla)</td></tr><tr><td style="border-color:rgb(0, 0, 0);height:75.8px;text-align:center;">Metrics</td><td style="border-color:rgb(0, 0, 0);height:75.8px;">Process efficiency, defect prevention rate, adherence to standards.</td><td style="border-color:rgb(0, 0, 0);height:75.8px;">Defect density, test coverage, defect resolution time.</td></tr></tbody></table></figure><h3>&nbsp;</h3><h3>&nbsp;</h3><h3>Objective</h3><ul><li>QA: Prevent defects from arising by building quality into every stage of the development process. Getting rid of problems early on saves a lot of money on fixes later on.</li><li>QC: Find and fix any defects in the final product. It makes sure that the software meets specified requirements, which means it's ready for users.</li></ul><h3>Approach&nbsp;</h3><ul><li>QA: QA is a proactive approach that works to prevent issues before they happen. Instead of waiting for problems, QA sets high standards from the start and verifies each stage meets quality standards.</li><li>QC: QC is a reactive approach that identifies and fixes any defects or gaps that may unexpectedly happen during the process. It validates that the final product meets all requirements, leaving no issues unresolved.</li></ul>&gt;&gt;&nbsp;Read more: <a href="https://reliasoftware.com/blog/difference-between-verification-and-validation">Difference between Verification and Validation in Software Testing</a><h3>Focus</h3><ul><li>QA: QA focuses on processes, improving how things are done at each stage of development. Its goal is to set up strong quality practices from the start, making sure each step follows set standards.</li><li>QC: QC focuses on the final product, testing the software to check if it meets the required standards. Through testing, QC makes sure the product is what users expect and need.</li></ul><h3>Timing</h3><ul><li>QA: QA starts right from the beginning of the Software Development Life Cycle (SDLC) and stays with the project through all of its stages—planning, design, development, and release.</li><li>QC: QC takes place mainly in the <a href="https://reliasoftware.com/blog/software-testing-life-cycle">Software Testing Life Cycle (STLC)</a>, after development is finished. It serves as a final check before release to help the product meet quality standards.</li></ul><h3>Team Involvement&nbsp;</h3><ul><li>QA: QA brings together various stakeholders like project managers, developers, and product owners to set and maintain <a href="https://reliasoftware.com/blog/software-development-standards-and-best-practices">quality standards throughout the development process</a>. Their main focus is to ensure that processes align to deliver consistent quality.</li><li>QC: QC primarily involves the testing team, who are responsible for testing and validating the product. Additionally, end-user feedback may also be included during acceptance testing to confirm that the product meets their expectations.</li></ul><h3>Tasks</h3>QA Team:<ul><li>Set up processes and standards for quality.</li><li>Conduct regular audits to ensure quality standards are being followed.</li><li>Review requirements and evaluate design documents.</li><li>Perform risk analyses to identify potential issues early.</li><li>Collaborate with developers to maintain quality from the beginning of the development cycle.</li></ul>QC Team:<ul><li>Run test cases on the finished product to make sure it works.</li><li>Analyze test results and track identified defects.</li><li>Conduct regression and <a href="https://reliasoftware.com/blog/functional-testing">functional testing</a> to verify performance and reliability.</li><li>Report bugs to the development team for fixing.</li><li>Re-test fixes to ensure they don't cause any new problems.</li></ul><h3>Time Consumption</h3><ul><li>QA: QA requires time investment throughout the project, but it's most important in the beginning when quality standards and procedures are set. QA cuts down on problems and extra work later in the cycle, but it takes ongoing work.</li><li>QC: QC usually requires time at the end of the development process, focusing on testing the final product. The amount of time needed depends on how complicated the product is and how many bugs there are in it.</li></ul><h3>Type of Tools</h3><ul><li>QA Tools: QA tools support process management, documentation, and static analysis. Common tools include Jira (for tracking), Confluence (for documentation), and SonarQube (for code quality). These tools help the team set and monitor quality practices. Besides, teams should also consider <a href="https://www.aikido.dev/blog/sonarqube-alternatives/" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">SonarQube competitors</a> to have more suitable options.</li><li>QC Tools: QC tools are used for testing and tracking defects. Popular tools are Selenium (for <a href="https://reliasoftware.com/blog/automation-testing-functions-tools-cost-and-benefits">automation tests</a>), Postman (for <a href="https://reliasoftware.com/blog/api-testing-tools">API testing</a>), and Bugzilla (for defect tracking). These tools help QC teams make sure the product works and is of good quality.</li></ul>&gt;&gt;&nbsp;You may be interested in:<ul><li>Top 6 <a href="https://reliasoftware.com/blog/top-automation-testing-tools">Automation Testing Tools</a> for Businesses in 2024</li><li>Top 7 <a href="https://reliasoftware.com/blog/web-app-security-testing-tools">Web App Security Testing Tools</a> For Developers</li><li>Top 7 Best <a href="https://reliasoftware.com/blog/performance-testing-tools">Performance Testing Tools</a> for Developers</li></ul><h3>Measurement and Metrics&nbsp;</h3><ul><li>QA: QA metrics might include process efficiency, adherence to standards, and defect prevention rates. These metrics focus on the effectiveness of processes.&nbsp;</li><li>QC: QC metrics are often related to the product, such as defect density, test coverage, and time to resolve defects. These <a href="https://reliasoftware.com/blog/product-metrics-in-software-engineering">metrics assess product readiness and quality</a> before release.</li></ul><figure class="image"><img src="https://api.reliasoftware.com/uploads/difference_between_qa_and_qc_80b2b38e7e.webp" alt="Key Differences Between QA and QC in Software Testing"><figcaption>Key Differences Between QA and QC in Software Testing.</figcaption></figure><h2>How QA and QC Work Together?</h2>QA and QC can complement each other's roles:<ul><li>QA and QC work together to create a strong quality plan. QA sets the foundation by building quality into processes from the start to prevent issues before they occur. QC then steps in to test the final product, identifying and fixing any missed defects to provide an extra layer of assurance.&nbsp;</li><li>QC provides helpful feedback to QA to improve future work. When QC finds repeating issues or common mistakes, QA can update standards, change guidelines, or improve processes to prevent these problems from happening again. This feedback loop between QA and QC supports ongoing improvement, helping teams improve the process and the product over time.</li></ul><h2>FAQs</h2>Are QA and QC interchangeable?No, QA and QC are not interchangeable. QA is focused on preventing defects by setting up quality processes from the start, while QC tests the final product to catch and fix any remaining issues. QA ensures quality through proactive planning, whereas QC provides a final check through testing and validation.What are the cost impacts of prioritizing QA over QC in a development project?Prioritizing QA can lower long-term costs by reducing rework and defects early in the process. It minimizes expensive last-minute fixes in QC, leading to more efficient resource use and cost savings over time.What types of projects might require a heavier focus on QA compared to QC, or vice versa?Projects that are complex or have strict regulations usually need more QA to prevent issues early. On the other hand, smaller projects or prototypes might focus more on QC to test functionality without needing extensive process control.&gt;&gt;&nbsp;Read more testing-related topics:<ul><li>Detailed Explanation of 7 <a href="https://reliasoftware.com/blog/software-testing-principles">Software Testing Principles</a></li><li>4&nbsp;<a href="https://reliasoftware.com/blog/levels-of-testing-in-software-testing">Levels Of Testing In Software Testing</a>: Explanation &amp; Examples</li><li><a href="https://reliasoftware.com/blog/test-plan-in-software-testing">How to Write A Powerful Test Plan in Software Testing</a>?</li><li><a href="https://reliasoftware.com/blog/manual-testing-vs-automation-testing">Manual Testing vs Automation Testing</a>: Which is Better?</li></ul><h2>Conclusion</h2>QA and QC are both important for creating high-quality software, but they focus on different parts of the process. QA is proactive, building quality into each step of development to prevent issues early on. QC is reactive, finding and fixing any leftover issues in the final product. Together, they create a balanced approach: QA helps reduce defects from the start, and QC makes sure the product is user-ready.Using both QA and QC allows teams to work more effectively, cut costs, and deliver reliable software. Understanding how these two roles support each other helps teams make better choices, improve quality throughout development, and consistently meet user expectations.&gt;&gt;&gt; Follow and Contact <a href="https://reliasoftware.com/">Relia Software</a> for more information!

QA focuses on preventing defects by setting up quality processes from the start, while QC tests the final product to catch and fix any remaining issues.

What is The Difference Between QA and QC in Software Testing? | Relia Software

What is The Difference Between QA and QC in Software Testing?

large_Difference Between QA and QC  in Software Testing.png

medium_Difference Between QA and QC  in Software Testing.png

small_Difference Between QA and QC  in Software Testing.png

thumbnail_Difference Between QA and QC  in Software Testing.png

Difference Between QA and QC  in Software Testing.png

Adhoc testing is an informal and instinct-driven testing method where testers explore software apps without predefined plans or test cases. Check out examples here!

A Complete Guide to Adhoc Testing with Practical Examples

large_adhoc-testing.webp

medium_adhoc-testing.webp

small_adhoc-testing.webp

thumbnail_adhoc-testing.webp

adhoc-testing.webp

What is Adhoc Testing? Types, Benefits, and How to Use

As your React application grows, ensuring that every component, hook, and API call works seamlessly becomes crucial. Enter <a href="https://reliasoftware.com/blog/what-is-unit-testing">unit testing</a>&mdash;your first line of defense against unexpected bugs and performance issues. Whether you're testing a component's UI rendering or verifying complex custom hooks with Jest, mastering these React unit testing best practices will boost your application's stability and scalability.
In this guide, we will focus on how to unit test React components, <a href="https://reliasoftware.com/blog/mastering-react-hooks">custom hooks</a>, and API fetch calls, along with snapshot testing for renderers. These techniques will help you build robust tests that keep your code clean and prevent bugs from sneaking into production.
&gt;&gt;&nbsp;Read more:&nbsp;
<ul>
<li>Mastering <a href="https://reliasoftware.com/blog/react-context-api">React Context API for Streamlined Data Sharing</a></li>
<li>Demystifying <a href="https://reliasoftware.com/blog/react-redux">React Redux for Centralized State Management</a></li>
</ul>
<h2>Why Unit Testing Matters in React Development?</h2>
Key benefits of unit testing React applications:
<ul>
<li>Early detection of bugs: Unit tests allow you to catch issues in <a href="https://reliasoftware.com/blog/react-component-library">React components</a> and custom hooks early in <a href="https://reliasoftware.com/blog/software-development-life-cycle-sdlc">the development cycle</a> before they affect users.</li>
<li>Maintainable codebase: By adding tests, you safeguard your project from regressions during refactoring code or adding new features.</li>
<li>Confidence in refactoring: Well-tested code makes it easier to update React components and custom hooks without the fear of breaking functionality.</li>
<li>Scalability of testing: As projects grow, unit testing scales by isolating components, ensuring each part functions independently, which keeps the system modular and easier to maintain.</li>
</ul>
When working on a React project, especially one that scales with multiple components, hooks, and APIs, unit tests become critical. They help maintain the quality of your application by ensuring that new features or bug fixes don't introduce regressions.
<h2>Setting Up React Unit Tests for React Applications</h2>
<h3>Installing Jest and React Testing Library</h3>
To begin unit testing in React, install Jest and React Testing Library to run tests and simulate user interactions efficiently.
<pre class="language-javascript"><code>npm install --save-dev jest @testing-library/react
</code></pre>
Update the <code>package.json</code> to include a test script:
<pre class="language-javascript"><code>"scripts": {
 "test": "jest"
}
</code></pre>
With this configuration, you&rsquo;re now set to write and run tests for your React components, hooks, and API fetch calls, ensuring all parts of your application work as expected.
<h3>Organizing Test Files in Your React Project</h3>
To keep your tests organized and maintainable, store them close to the code they test. This structure makes it easier to locate and maintain both your code and tests.
Example folder structure:
<pre class="language-javascript"><code>src/
 components/
 Button.js
 Button.test.js
</code></pre>
For larger projects, consider grouping tests by feature or using a dedicated <code>tests/</code> directory for better scalability. Keeping tests accessible and aligned with your code structure ensures that your project remains easy to manage as it grows.
<h2>Unit Testing for React Components</h2>
When testing&nbsp;React components, focus on what the user sees rather than internal logic. Tests should verify how a component behaves based on props, state, and user interactions, rather than how the component is implemented internally.
Example: Testing Component UI and Props
<pre class="language-javascript"><code>import { render, screen } from '@testing-library/react';
import MyComponent from './MyComponent';

test('renders component with correct text', () =&gt; {
 render(&lt;MyComponent text="Hello World" /&gt;);
 expect(screen.getByText(/Hello World/i)).toBeInTheDocument();
});
</code></pre>
This test ensures that the component renders the expected output based on its props. By focusing on the rendered UI, you ensure that your test will remain stable even if internal logic changes.
<h2>Unit Testing for&nbsp;React&nbsp;Hooks</h2>
Hooks often drive the business logic of React components, making them critical to test. If your hook&rsquo;s logic is independent of the component, it&rsquo;s better to test it directly using Jest and React Testing Library&rsquo;s <code>renderHook</code> from its hooks testing extension.
Example: Testing Custom Hook Logic
<pre class="language-javascript"><code>import { renderHook, act } from '@testing-library/react-hooks';
import { useMyCustomHook } from './useMyCustomHook';

test('should increment value', () =&gt; {
 const { result } = renderHook(() =&gt; useMyCustomHook());
 act(() =&gt; {
 result.current.increment();
 });
 expect(result.current.count).toBe(1);
});
</code></pre>
In this case, we&rsquo;re testing a custom hook that increments a counter. The act function ensures that state changes are applied immediately, allowing us to verify the logic synchronously.
&gt;&gt;&nbsp;Read more: Mastering <a href="https://reliasoftware.com/blog/asynchronous-testing-with-react-testing-library">Asynchronous Testing with React Testing Library</a>
Mermaid Decision Tree:
<pre class="language-javascript"><code>graph TD
 A[Do You Need to Test Hook Behavior?]
 A --&gt;|Yes| B[Is Hook Logic Independent?]
 A --&gt;|No| E[Test Component Behavior]
 B --&gt;|Yes| C["Test Hook Directly (renderHook)"]
 B --&gt;|No| D[Test via Component]
</code></pre>
<figure class="image align-center"><img src="https://api.reliasoftware.com/uploads/mermaid_decision_tree_545af71f47.webp" alt="Diagram for Deciding When to Test Hooks Directly" width="748" height="407">
<figcaption>Diagram for Deciding When to Test Hooks Directly</figcaption>
</figure>
<h2>Mocking Fetch Calls in React Unit Tests</h2>
Many React applications rely on API fetch calls to display dynamic data. Mocking these API calls is essential for keeping your tests fast, reliable, and independent of external services.
<div class="dark bg-gray-950 contain-inline-size rounded-md border-[0.5px] border-token-border-medium relative">
<div class="flex items-center text-token-text-secondary bg-token-main-surface-secondary px-4 py-2 text-xs font-sans justify-between rounded-t-md h-9">
<pre class="language-javascript"><code>jest.mock('./api', () =&gt; ({
 fetchData: jest.fn(() =&gt; Promise.resolve({ data: 'mockData' }))
}));
</code></pre>
By mocking the API with Jest, you ensure that your tests aren&rsquo;t affected by network conditions or external data changes. You can simulate different responses to test how your component handles both success and failure scenarios.
<h2>Snapshot <a href="https://reliasoftware.com/blog/react-test-renderer">Testing for Component Renderers</a></h2>
Snapshot testing is particularly useful for verifying the UI output of a React component at a given point in time. Snapshots compare the current rendered output with a saved version to ensure no unexpected changes occur.</div>
<div class="flex items-center text-token-text-secondary bg-token-main-surface-secondary px-4 py-2 text-xs font-sans justify-between rounded-t-md h-9">
<pre class="language-javascript"><code>import { render } from '@testing-library/react';
import MyComponent from './MyComponent';

test('renders component correctly', () =&gt; {
 const { asFragment } = render(&lt;MyComponent /&gt;);
 expect(asFragment()).toMatchSnapshot();
});
</code></pre>
Snapshots are ideal for static components where the output is consistent across renders. However, use snapshots cautiously for dynamic or frequently updated UI components, as changes to props or data may make snapshots more difficult to maintain.
<h2>Ensuring Coverage and Performance of React Unit Testing with Jest</h2>
<h3>Test Coverage in Jest</h3>
Jest provides built-in tools to measure test coverage, ensuring your unit tests cover critical parts of your React application. Coverage metrics include statements, branches, functions, and lines, offering a detailed view of which areas of your code are tested.
<pre class="language-javascript"><code>jest --coverage
</code></pre>
<h3>Balancing Test Speed and Depth</h3>
As your application grows, it's essential to balance comprehensive testing with performance. Increasing test depth&mdash;covering more edge cases&mdash;can slow down execution.
The solution is to mock expensive operations (like API calls or database interactions) while ensuring core logic is thoroughly tested. This approach helps maintain fast test execution without sacrificing test quality.
</div>
</div>
<figure class="image"><img style="display: block; margin-left: auto; margin-right: auto;" src="https://api.reliasoftware.com/uploads/speed_depth_tradeoff_4455a2657b.webp" alt="Trade-Off Between Test Speed and Depth" width="750" height="536">
<figcaption>Trade-Off Between Test Speed and Depth</figcaption>
</figure>
<h2>Conclusion</h2>
React unit testing with Jest and React Testing Library is crucial for ensuring the stability and scalability of your application. By focusing on testing components, hooks, API fetch calls, and rendered UI, you build a foundation for a robust and reliable codebase. Mocking API calls helps keep your tests efficient, while snapshot testing ensures UI consistency over time.
Start small and scale your testing strategy as your application grows. Consistency is key&mdash;regularly writing and maintaining tests will help ensure long-term code quality and reliability in your <a href="https://reliasoftware.com/blog/react-project-ideas">React projects</a>.
&gt;&gt;&gt; Follow and Contact&nbsp;<a href="https://reliasoftware.com/">Relia Software</a>&nbsp;for more information

Learn how to implement React unit testing using Jest and React Testing Library. Master best practices for testing components, custom hooks, API calls, and snapshots.

Implement React Unit Testing with Jest and React Testing Library | Relia Software

React Unit Testing with Jest and React Testing Library

large_react-unit-testing-with-jest-and-react-testing-library.webp

medium_react-unit-testing-with-jest-and-react-testing-library.webp

small_react-unit-testing-with-jest-and-react-testing-library.webp

thumbnail_react-unit-testing-with-jest-and-react-testing-library.webp

react-unit-testing-with-jest-and-react-testing-library.webp

Implement React Unit Testing with Jest and React Testing Library

Manual testing involves testers running tests manually without using any automation tools, while automation testing uses automated tools and scripts to run tests without human involvement.

Manual Testing vs Automation Testing: Which is Better? | Relia Software

large_manual-testing-vs-automation-testing.webp

medium_manual-testing-vs-automation-testing.webp

small_manual-testing-vs-automation-testing.webp

thumbnail_manual-testing-vs-automation-testing.webp

manual-testing-vs-automation-testing.webp

Manual Testing vs Automation Testing: A Head-to-Head Comparison

Product metrics in software engineering are specific, quantifiable measures used to assess various aspects of a software product's performance, quality, and usage.

Product Metrics in Software Engineering: A Comprehensive Guide | Relia Software

Product Metrics in Software Engineering: A Comprehensive Guide

large_product-metrics-in-software-engineering.webp

medium_product-metrics-in-software-engineering.webp

small_product-metrics-in-software-engineering.webp

thumbnail_product-metrics-in-software-engineering.webp

product-metrics-in-software-engineering.webp

Product Metrics in Software Engineering: Types, Techniques, Tools

Automation in software development involves using tools and technologies to handle repetitive and time-consuming tasks to improve efficiency, productivity, and quality.

Unlock the Potential of Automation in Software Development | Relia Software

Unlock the Potential of Automation in Software DevelopmentUnlock the Potential of Automation in Software Development

large_automation-in-software-development.webp

medium_automation-in-software-development.webp

small_automation-in-software-development.webp

thumbnail_automation-in-software-development.webp

automation-in-software-development.webp

Unlock the Potential of Automation in Software Development

xUnit, JUnit, Jest, Mocha, Pytest, RSpec, Cypress, NUnit, MSTest, TestNG, Selenide, Jasmine, etc, are 15 popular open-source unit testing frameworks for developers.

Top 15 Open-Source Unit Testing Frameworks For Developers | Relia Software

large_unit-testing-frameworks.webp

medium_unit-testing-frameworks.webp

small_unit-testing-frameworks.webp

thumbnail_unit-testing-frameworks.webp

unit-testing-frameworks.webp

Top 15 Open-Source Unit Testing Frameworks For Developers

<a href="https://reliasoftware.com/blog/an-in-depth-guide-to-web-application-security-for-businesses">Web application security</a> testing becomes more important as the problem of leaking information rises. However, IBM (International Business Machines) predicts that half of compromised organizations didn't boost security spending. Web application security testing isn't hard given expertise and affordable tools recently.&nbsp;This article discusses web application security testing tools and offers expert advice on how to choose the right one.&gt;&gt; Read more:&nbsp;<ul><li><a href="https://reliasoftware.com/blog/custom-web-app-development">Custom Web App Development</a>: Detail Explanation</li><li>An In-Depth Guide to <a href="https://reliasoftware.com/blog/single-page-applications-spas">Single Page Applications (SPAs)</a></li><li>9 <a href="https://reliasoftware.com/blog/signs-your-business-needs-a-web-application">Signs Your Business Needs A Web Application</a></li><li>7 Necessary <a href="https://reliasoftware.com/blog/network-debugging-tools" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">Network Debugging Tools</a> for DevOps Experts</li></ul><h2>GitHub</h2>GitHub, an open-source software repository, contains many web application security testing tools. These tools enable you to detect and patch problems before attackers exploit them, thereby protecting your application and user data.Types:&nbsp;<ul><li>SAST (e.g. SASTify, GoSec, Bandit).</li><li>DAST (e.g., Wapiti, Netsparker Community Edition, OpenVAS).</li><li>IAST (e.g., Konf security or Arachni is partially open-source)</li><li>Penetration Testing Tools (such as Kali Linux, Metasploit Framework, or Ettercap)</li></ul>Features:<ul><li>Vulnerability scanning and detection: Find probable flaws in your application.</li><li>False positive reduction: Reducing irrelevant alarms allows for a more focused investigation.</li><li>Reporting and Prioritisation: Receive clear reports indicating important vulnerabilities that require immediate attention.</li><li>Integration with development workflows: Make <a href="https://reliasoftware.com/blog/security-testing-in-software-testing">security testing</a> part of your development process.</li></ul>Competitive Advantages:<ul><li>Cost-effective: Free to use and modify, which saves you money.</li><li>Transparency: Open-source code enables scrutiny and modification.</li><li>Active Community: Benefit from the wisdom of developers across the world.</li></ul><img src="https://api.reliasoftware.com/uploads/github_tool_1e345412d7.webp" alt="Github tool"><h2>Contrast CodeSec - Scan &amp; Serverless</h2>Contrast CodeSec - Scan and Serverless provides a surprisingly easy solution. This tool, which is available on GitHub, allows you to find and address vulnerabilities in your web apps right from your development workflow.Types: SAST tool.Features:<ul><li>Fast Scans: Receive results rapidly to keep development going.</li><li>Actionable Tip: Learn how to patch vulnerabilities and prioritize them.</li><li>Easy integration: Integrates easily with your GitHub workflow.</li><li>Scans Java, JavaScript, and .NET: Supports common programming languages.</li></ul>Competitive Advantages:<ul><li>Simple setup: link to GitHub and scan.</li><li>Developer-Friendly: Clear results assist developers in writing secure code.</li><li>Free for Open Source: An affordable choice for open-source projects.</li></ul><img src="https://api.reliasoftware.com/uploads/contrast_codesec_tool_0eae0fcbd9.webp" alt="contrast codesec tool"><h2>Coverity Scan Static Analysis</h2>Coverity Scan Static Analysis is an extremely useful tool available on GitHub. This complete solution looks deeply into your application's source code, detecting and correcting security flaws before they become significant.&nbsp;Furthermore, this tool is suitable for enterprises with large web applications and sophisticated coding and security-conscious organizations that comply with industry security standards and laws.Type: SAST tool.Features:<ul><li>Deep Analysis: Identifies a broader range of vulnerabilities than standard SAST tools.</li><li>Accurate Results: Fewer false positives, which saves you time correcting actual problems.</li><li>Works with your workflow: It integrates with <a href="https://reliasoftware.com/blog/software-development-tools">development tools</a> and <a href="https://reliasoftware.com/blog/5-best-practices-for-enhancing-ci-cd-pipeline-security">CI/CD pipeline security</a> processes.</li><li>Security Standards Check: Ensures that your code adheres to security best practices.</li><li>Supports Multiple Languages: Scans code written in common <a href="https://reliasoftware.com/blog/which-web-development-language-should-you-learn">web development languages</a>.</li></ul>Competitive Advantages:<ul><li>Super Accurate: Less time lost on false alerts.</li><li>Discovers Additional Weaknesses: More thorough security assessments for a stronger app.</li><li>Scales well: Can handle enormous code bases for complicated web applications.</li></ul><img src="https://api.reliasoftware.com/uploads/coverity_tool_da019e42b0.webp" alt="Coverity Tool"><h2>ZAP</h2>ZAP enables you to be a web security activist. This powerful tool serves as an intermediary, intercepting communications between your browser and <a href="https://reliasoftware.com/blog/custom-web-app-development">the web application</a>. ZAP analyses this traffic, allowing you to detect and exploit weaknesses in the same way that a real attacker would.Type: DAST tool.Features:<ul><li>Security Lookout: ZAP analyses interactions between your browser and the web app.</li><li>Test Login Strength: Test your logins' security by simulating hacker attacks.</li><li>Find Data Leaks: Look for flaws that could allow hackers to steal information.</li><li>Catch malicious scripts: Identify vulnerabilities that could allow attackers to inject malicious code.</li><li>Customizable Tests: Focus your testing on specific flaws that you are concerned about.</li></ul>Competitive Advantages:<ul><li>Free and Open-source: There's no need to pay for expensive licenses.</li><li>Active Community: Benefit from a community that is continually working to enhance ZAP.</li><li>ZAP Marketplace: Add-ons allow you to expand your toolkit with even more functions.</li><li>Simple to Use: Use ZAP even if you're new to web security testing.</li></ul><img src="https://api.reliasoftware.com/uploads/zap_tool_53ac720c48.webp" alt="ZAP tool"><h2>Arachni</h2>Arachni is a feature-rich web security scanner hosted on GitHub. It combines two testing strategies:<ul><li>Code Scrutiny: Checks your code for flaws such as SQL injection.</li><li>Dynamic Defence: Simulates real-world attacks to identify weaknesses in your running program.</li></ul>&gt;&gt; Read more: An Ultimate Guide to Different <a href="https://reliasoftware.com/blog/test-case-design-techniques">Test Case Design Techniques</a>Types: Combines parts of SAST and DAST to provide an extensive method of security analysis.Features:<ul><li>Code Scanner: Discovers flaws buried in your code.</li><li>Attack Simulator: This tool simulates real-world attacks to determine how well your app performs.</li><li>Expandable Toolkit: Add extra functionality by using plugins for specialized security tests.</li><li>Detailed details: Receive clear details on risks and how to address them.</li><li>Customization Options: Able to customize testing options to meet your requirements.</li></ul>Competitive Advantages:<ul><li>Free and Open-source: There's no need to pay for expensive licenses.</li><li>Pick Your Tools: Select the features required for targeted testing.</li><li>Highly Expandable: Using plugins, you can add functionality to meet specific needs.</li><li>Active Community: Benefit from continuing development and a supportive user base.</li></ul><img src="https://api.reliasoftware.com/uploads/arachni_tool_3b95457500.webp" alt="Arachni tool"><h2>Contrast Community Edition (CE)</h2>Contrast CE is a thorough web application security testing platform hosted on GitHub. It combines functionality from many testing methodologies to provide a comprehensive solution for developers and security professionals.Type: SAST tools.Features:<ul><li>Find Code Weaknesses: Detect vulnerabilities in your code before they cause issues.</li><li>Uncover Hidden Risks: Detect security flaws in libraries on which your app relies.</li><li>Partial Attack Protection: Helps prevent some attacks from occurring.</li><li>Simple to Use: It integrates seamlessly with your development workflow.</li><li>Clear Instructions: Receive step-by-step instructions on how to remedy problems.</li></ul>Competitive Advantages:<ul><li>Multi-layered Security: Combines many testing methods for a comprehensive approach.</li><li>Developer-friendly: Simple to use and comprehend for developers.</li><li>Cost-effective: This approach is for open-source development.</li></ul><img src="https://api.reliasoftware.com/uploads/contrast_tool_8f91579f0a.webp" alt="Contrast tool "><h2>SpotBugs</h2>SpotBugs is a static application security testing (SAST) tool hosted on GitHub. It examines your code line by line, looking for flaws before your application even launches.Type: SAST tool.Features:<ul><li>Deep Code Analysis: Dig deep into your code to identify a variety of potential faults.</li><li>Customizable Checks: Direct SpotBugs to the portions of your code that concern you the most.</li><li>Works with your tools. Integration with common development tools ensures a smooth workflow.</li><li>Free and open-source: There is no need to pay for pricey licenses.</li></ul>Competitive Advantages:<ul><li>Free to Use: Available to everyone, regardless of budget.</li><li>Highly Extensible: Add new functionality using plugins for certain coding styles and frameworks.</li><li>Active Community: Benefit from continuous enhancements and problem fixes from a devoted developer community.</li></ul><img src="https://api.reliasoftware.com/uploads/spot_bugs_tool_4c9c56aaa4.webp" alt="spot bugs tool"><h2>How to Choose the Right Web App Security Testing Tool?</h2>There are so many choices that it can be hard to pick a web app security testing tool. Here are some important things to keep in mind as you look for the right tool for your needs.<ul><li>Budget: There are a lot of different types of security tools, from free ones to paid ones with lots of features. To cut down your options, first figure out how much money you have.</li><li>Important Features: Do you need to protect your app while it's running, or do you just need a good security scanner? You can choose a tool with the right features if you know what kind of security you need.</li><li>Simple to Use: Is it easy to use the tool, or is it like learning rocket science? A complicated tool might be great for security experts, but coders might want something easier that works with their workflow.</li><li>Security Weaknesses: Some tools are made to fix certain security problems. The key to good testing is choosing a tool that can fix your unique problems.</li></ul>&gt;&gt; Read more:&nbsp;<ul><li>Top 6 <a href="https://reliasoftware.com/blog/top-automation-testing-tools">Automation Testing Tools</a> for Businesses</li><li>Top 10 Best <a href="https://reliasoftware.com/blog/end-to-end-testing-tool-and-frameworks">End-to-End Testing Tools and Frameworks</a></li><li>Top 7 Best <a href="https://reliasoftware.com/blog/performance-testing-tools">Performance Testing Tools</a> for Developers</li><li>Top 9 Best <a href="https://reliasoftware.com/blog/devops-deployment-tools">DevOps Deployment Tools</a> for Businesses</li><li>Top 20 Open-Source <a href="https://reliasoftware.com/blog/unit-testing-frameworks">Unit Testing Frameworks</a> For Developers</li><li>Top 15 <a href="https://reliasoftware.com/blog/application-monitoring-tools">Application Monitoring Tools</a> For Businesses</li><li>Top 9 Modern <a href="https://reliasoftware.com/blog/software-development-tools">Software Development Tools</a> for Businesses</li><li>Top 10 <a href="https://reliasoftware.com/blog/automated-code-review-tools">Automated Code Review Tools</a> For Developers</li></ul><h2>Conclusion</h2>Web application security must be ensured. Some web application security testing tools are essential, even though experts have diverse approaches. Implementing security procedures and tools may seem intimidating, but it will get more efficient when choosing the right tools for the right problem. Remember to consider your budget and main problems to choose the most efficient tool for your project.&gt;&gt;&gt; Follow and Contact <a href="https://reliasoftware.com/">Relia Software</a> for more information!

The top 7 leading web app security testing tools for developers include GitHub, Contrast CodeSec, ZAP, Arachni, Contrast Community Edition, and SpotBugs.

Top 7 Web App Security Testing Tools For Developers | Relia Software

large_web-app-security-testing-tools.webp

medium_web-app-security-testing-tools.webp

small_web-app-security-testing-tools.webp

thumbnail_web-app-security-testing-tools.webp

web-app-security-testing-tools.webp

Top 7 Web App Security Testing Tools For Developers

Postman, Katalon Studio, Apigee, Rest Assured, Assetible, ACCELQ, ReadyAPI Karate Labs, Testsigma, Insomnia, etc, are 12 popular API automation testing tools.

Top 12 API Testing Tools for Software Testing Process | Relia Software

large_api-testing-tools.webp

medium_api-testing-tools.webp

small_api-testing-tools.webp

thumbnail_api-testing-tools.webp

api-testing-tools.webp

Top 12 API Testing Tools for Software Testing Process

Have you ever wondered <a href="https://reliasoftware.com/blog/software-testing-life-cycle">how software gets thoroughly checked</a> before it reaches your hands? There are actually two main types of testing that software goes through: <a href="https://reliasoftware.com/blog/functional-testing">functional testing</a> and <a href="https://reliasoftware.com/blog/non-functional-testing">non-functional testing</a>. Both play vital roles in ensuring a smooth and reliable software experience, but they focus on different aspects.&nbsp;
This article will cut through the confusion and explain the key differences between functional and non-functional testing in a clear and easy-to-understand way. So, by the end, you'll be able to tell the difference between testing how a feature works and testing how well it performs!
&gt;&gt;&nbsp;Read more about software testing:
<ul>
<li dir="ltr">4 <a href="https://reliasoftware.com/blog/levels-of-testing-in-software-testing">Levels Of Testing</a> In Software Testing</li>
<li dir="ltr">Detailed Explanation of 7 <a href="https://reliasoftware.com/blog/software-testing-principles">Software Testing Principles</a></li>
<li dir="ltr">Exploring The <a href="https://reliasoftware.com/blog/importance-of-software-testing">Importance Of Software Testing</a></li>
<li dir="ltr">How to <a href="https://reliasoftware.com/blog/test-plan-in-software-testing">Write A Powerful Test Plan</a> in Software Testing?</li>
<li dir="ltr"><a class="blog_post__u0IVW" href="https://reliasoftware.com/blog/difference-between-verification-and-validation">Difference between Verification and Validation in Software Testing</a></li>
</ul>
<figure class="image align-center"><img style="display: block; margin-left: auto; margin-right: auto;" src="https://api.reliasoftware.com/uploads/functional_vs_non_functional_testing_705cc7c5ae.webp" alt="functional-vs-non-functional-testing.webp" width="859" height="516">
<figcaption>Key Differences Between Functional and Non-Functional Testing.</figcaption>
</figure>
<h2 dir="ltr">What is the Difference Between Functional and Non-Functional Testing?</h2>
Suppose that you're building a brand new car. Functional testing would be like checking if the engine starts, the steering wheel turns the wheels, and the brakes bring the car to a stop. It's all about ensuring the car performs its basic functions as intended.
Non-functional testing, on the other hand, would be like taking the car for a spin and evaluating how well it performs those functions. Does the engine roar to life smoothly, or does it sputter and cough? Does the steering respond quickly and precisely, or is there a lag between your turn and the car's movement? These aspects delve into the car's overall experience, not just its basic functionalities.
<h3 dir="ltr">Focus vs. Functionality</h3>
Here's where the core difference lies:
<ul>
<li dir="ltr" role="presentation">Functional Testing: Focuses on what the software does. It verifies if features work according to their specifications and requirements. Think of it as checking off a list of functionalities, ensuring each one performs as designed.</li>
<li dir="ltr" role="presentation">Non-Functional Testing: Evaluates how the software performs. It goes beyond the basic "does it work?" question and delves into characteristics like speed, stability, security, usability, and scalability. Here, the tester is like a seasoned driver evaluating the car's handling, comfort, and overall performance.</li>
</ul>
<h3 dir="ltr">Techniques</h3>
Functional and non-functional testing also use different approaches:
<ul>
<li dir="ltr" role="presentation">Functional Testing: Often employs <a href="https://reliasoftware.com/blog/test-case-design-techniques">testing techniques</a> like black-box testing, where the tester interacts with the software without knowing its internal workings, or white-box testing, where the tester has access to the software's code. Regression testing ensures that new features don't break existing functionalities.</li>
<li dir="ltr" role="presentation">Non-Functional Testing: This might involve <a href="https://reliasoftware.com/blog/performance-testing-tools">performance testing</a> to measure website loading times under various loads, usability testing to observe how real users interact with the interface, and <a href="https://reliasoftware.com/blog/security-testing-in-software-testing">security testing</a> to identify and plug vulnerabilities.</li>
</ul>
<h3 dir="ltr">Benefits and Goals</h3>
Ultimately, both functional and non-functional testing contribute to a successful software product.&nbsp;
<ul>
<li dir="ltr" role="presentation">Functional testing ensures the software functions as intended, delivering the promised features and functionalities.&nbsp;</li>
<li dir="ltr" role="presentation">Non-functional testing helps create a positive user experience by making sure the software performs well, is secure, and is easy to use.&nbsp;</li>
</ul>
By combining these two testing types, developers and testers can create high-quality software that not only works but also works wonderfully.
Here is a table summarizing the key points of comparison for easier reference:
<div dir="ltr" align="left">
<table style="border-collapse: collapse; border-color: rgb(0, 0, 0); border-style: solid; width: 90.8617%;" border="1"><colgroup><col style="width: 19.15%;" width="110"><col style="width: 38.4903%;" width="257"><col style="width: 42.3226%;" width="257"></colgroup>
<tbody>
<tr>
<td style="border-color: rgb(0, 0, 0); text-align: center;">
Criteria
</td>
<td style="border-color: rgb(0, 0, 0); text-align: center;">
Functional Testing
</td>
<td style="border-color: rgb(0, 0, 0); text-align: center;">
Non-Functional Testing
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td style="border-color: rgb(0, 0, 0); text-align: center;">
Focus
</td>
<td style="border-color: rgb(0, 0, 0);">
What the software does.
</td>
<td style="border-color: rgb(0, 0, 0);">
How the software performs.
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td style="border-color: rgb(0, 0, 0); text-align: center;">
Objective
</td>
<td style="border-color: rgb(0, 0, 0);">
Verifies features work according to specifications.
</td>
<td style="border-color: rgb(0, 0, 0);">
Evaluates software characteristics beyond core functionalities.
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td style="border-color: rgb(0, 0, 0); text-align: center;">
Examples
</td>
<td style="border-color: rgb(0, 0, 0);">
<ul>
<li dir="ltr" aria-level="1">
User login and registration
</li>
<li dir="ltr" aria-level="1">
Processing payments
</li>
<li dir="ltr" aria-level="1">
Adding items to cart
</li>
</ul>
</td>
<td style="border-color: rgb(0, 0, 0);">
<ul>
<li dir="ltr" aria-level="1">
Website loading speed
</li>
<li dir="ltr" aria-level="1">
User interface intuitiveness
</li>
<li dir="ltr" aria-level="1">
Security of user data
</li>
</ul>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td style="border-color: rgb(0, 0, 0); text-align: center;">
Techniques
</td>
<td style="border-color: rgb(0, 0, 0);">
<ul>
<li dir="ltr" aria-level="1">
Black-box testing
</li>
<li dir="ltr" aria-level="1">
White-box testing
</li>
<li dir="ltr" aria-level="1">
Regression testing
</li>
<li dir="ltr" aria-level="1">
etc.
</li>
</ul>
</td>
<td style="border-color: rgb(0, 0, 0);">
<ul>
<li dir="ltr" aria-level="1">
Performance testing
</li>
<li dir="ltr" aria-level="1">
Usability testing
</li>
<li dir="ltr" aria-level="1">
Security testing
</li>
<li dir="ltr" aria-level="1">
etc.
</li>
</ul>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td style="border-color: rgb(0, 0, 0); text-align: center;">
Goals
</td>
<td style="border-color: rgb(0, 0, 0);">
Ensures software functions as intended.
</td>
<td style="border-color: rgb(0, 0, 0);">
Creates a positive user experience.
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td style="border-color: rgb(0, 0, 0); text-align: center;">
Benefits
</td>
<td style="border-color: rgb(0, 0, 0);">
Delivers promised features and functionalities.
</td>
<td style="border-color: rgb(0, 0, 0);">
Improves performance, usability, and security.
</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
</div>
<h2 dir="ltr">Practical Example: Comparing Functional vs. Non-Functional Testing in a Mobile App</h2>
Let's analyze the <a href="https://reliasoftware.com/blog/food-delivery-app-development">development of a mobile food ordering app</a> to illustrate the distinct roles of functional and non-functional testing.
<h3 dir="ltr">Functional Testing</h3>
<ul>
<li dir="ltr" role="presentation">Criteria: Verifying core functionalities as per specifications.</li>
<li dir="ltr" role="presentation">Example:
<ul>
<li>Users can successfully register and login.</li>
<li>Browse through restaurant menus and add desired items to the cart.</li>
<li>Apply discounts and coupons accurately.</li>
<li>Securely process payment information and confirm orders.</li>
</ul>
</li>
</ul>
<h3 dir="ltr">Non-Functional Testing</h3>
<ul>
<li dir="ltr" role="presentation">Criteria: Evaluating software characteristics beyond core functions.</li>
<li dir="ltr" style="font-weight: bold;" role="presentation">Example:</li>
</ul>
<div dir="ltr" align="left">
<table style="border-collapse: collapse; width: 91.2092%; height: 294.6px; margin-left: auto; margin-right: auto; border: 1px solid rgb(0, 0, 0);" border="1"><colgroup><col style="width: 19.5901%;" width="113"><col style="width: 80.3744%;" width="511"></colgroup>
<tbody>
<tr style="height: 120.4px;">
<td style="border-color: rgb(0, 0, 0); height: 120.4px; text-align: center;">
Performance
</td>
<td style="border-color: rgb(0, 0, 0); height: 120.4px;">
<ul>
<li dir="ltr" role="presentation">Does the app load quickly on various devices (phones, tablets)?</li>
<li dir="ltr" role="presentation">Can it handle multiple users ordering simultaneously without lagging?</li>
</ul>
</td>
</tr>
<tr style="height: 100.8px;">
<td style="border-color: rgb(0, 0, 0); height: 100.8px; text-align: center;">
Usability
</td>
<td style="border-color: rgb(0, 0, 0); height: 100.8px;">
<ul>
<li dir="ltr" role="presentation">Is the app interface intuitive and easy to navigate for users of all ages and technical backgrounds?</li>
<li dir="ltr" role="presentation">Are menus and ordering steps clear and user-friendly?</li>
</ul>
</td>
</tr>
<tr style="height: 73.4px;">
<td style="border-color: rgb(0, 0, 0); height: 73.4px; text-align: center;">
Security
</td>
<td style="border-color: rgb(0, 0, 0); height: 73.4px;">
<ul>
<li dir="ltr" role="presentation">Is user data (account information, payment details) encrypted and protected from breaches?</li>
<li dir="ltr" role="presentation">&nbsp;Does the app have secure authentication methods to prevent unauthorized access?</li>
</ul>
</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
</div>
<h3 dir="ltr">Comparison Analysis</h3>
This example highlights the clear distinction between functional and non-functional testing. Functional testing ensures the core functionalities like user registration, order placement, and payment processing work as intended.
On the other hand, non-functional testing digs deeper. It evaluates the app's performance under real-world conditions, considering factors like user load and device variations. It assesses the user interface's usability, ensuring a smooth and intuitive ordering experience for everyone. Finally, security testing safeguards sensitive user data and ensures the overall safety of the app.
<figure class="image align-center"><img src="https://api.reliasoftware.com/uploads/comparing_functional_vs_non_functional_testing_in_a_mobile_app_55b782a8af.webp" alt="A Practical Example for Comparing Functional vs. Non-Functional Testing in a Mobile App" width="890" height="534">
<figcaption>A Practical Example for Comparing Functional vs. Non-Functional Testing in a Mobile App.</figcaption>
</figure>
<h2 dir="ltr">When to Use Each Type: Functional vs. Non-Functional Testing</h2>
Here's a breakdown of when to use each type of testing:
<ul>
<li dir="ltr" role="presentation">Functional Testing First: Functional testing is usually done early in development to make sure the core features work as planned.&nbsp; Think of it as catching any big mistakes before you invest more time and effort.</li>
<li dir="ltr" role="presentation">Non-Functional Testing Throughout: Non-functional testing can happen at different stages. You can check the website's loading speed as features are added, or test the app's usability with real people to see if it's easy to use.</li>
<li dir="ltr" role="presentation">Working Together: Functional and non-functional testing work best together. By combining them, you can create software that works properly and is also enjoyable to use!</li>
</ul>
&gt;&gt;&nbsp;Read more:
<ul>
<li><a href="https://reliasoftware.com/blog/what-is-unit-testing">What is Unit Testing</a>? Definition, Benefits &amp; Process</li>
<li><a href="https://reliasoftware.com/blog/ai-in-software-testing">AI in Software Testing</a>: How It Works, Benefits &amp; Challenges</li>
<li>Top 10 Best <a href="https://reliasoftware.com/blog/end-to-end-testing-tool-and-frameworks">End-to-End Testing Tools and Frameworks</a></li>
<li>Top 6 <a href="https://reliasoftware.com/blog/top-automation-testing-tools">Automation Testing Tools</a> for Businesses</li>
<li><a href="https://reliasoftware.com/blog/manual-testing-vs-automation-testing">Manual Testing vs Automation Testing</a>: Which is Better?</li>
</ul>
<h2 dir="ltr">Conclusion</h2>
In the world of software development, both functional and non-functional testing play vital roles. Functional testing ensures the software fulfills its intended purpose by verifying core features work correctly. Non-functional testing delves deeper, evaluating how well the software performs in terms of speed, usability, security, and other user-centric aspects.
By working together, functional and non-functional testing create robust, high-quality software that not only functions as intended but also provides a positive user experience. This strong alliance ensures the software is built to last and delivers a truly satisfying experience for its users.
&gt;&gt;&gt; Follow and Contact&nbsp;<a href="https://reliasoftware.com/">Relia Software</a> for more information!

Functional Testing focuses on what the software does, while Non-Functional Testing evaluates how the software performs. Together, they ensure high-quality software.

Differences Between Functional and Non-Functional Testing | Relia Software

Differences Between Functional and Non-Functional Testing

large_difference-between-functional-and-non-functional-testing.webp

medium_difference-between-functional-and-non-functional-testing.webp

small_difference-between-functional-and-non-functional-testing.webp

thumbnail_difference-between-functional-and-non-functional-testing.webp

difference-between-functional-and-non-functional-testing.webp

Non-Functional Testing (NFT) is the evaluation of software characteristics that are external to its core features. NFT focuses on user experience and software health.

A Comprehensive Guide to Non-Functional Testing (NFT) | Relia Software

large_non-functional-testing.webp

medium_non-functional-testing.webp

small_non-functional-testing.webp

thumbnail_non-functional-testing.webp

non-functional-testing.webp

Testing Beyond Features: Unlock Non-Functional Testing (NFT)

JMeter, LoadRunner, Gatling, k6, ApacheBench, LoadNinja, and WebLOAD are the top 7 leading performance testing tools for developers and businesses.

Top 7 Best Performance Testing Tools for Developers

large_performance-testing-tools.webp

medium_performance-testing-tools.webp

small_performance-testing-tools.webp

thumbnail_performance-testing-tools.webp

performance-testing-tools.webp

7 Leading Performance Testing Tools for Developers

Test case design techniques include equivalence partitioning, boundary value analysis, decision table testing, statement coverage, data flow testing, error guessing, etc.&nbsp;

An Ultimate Guide to Different Test Case Design Techniques | Relia Software

large_test-case-design-techniques.webp

medium_test-case-design-techniques.webp

small_test-case-design-techniques.webp

thumbnail_test-case-design-techniques.webp

test-case-design-techniques.webp

An Ultimate Guide to Different Test Case Design Techniques

4 levels of testing in software testing are: unit for single code, integration for modules, system for overall functions, and acceptance for user feedback.

4 Levels Of Testing In Software Testing: Explanation & Examples

large_levels-of-testing-in-software-testing.webp

medium_levels-of-testing-in-software-testing.webp

small_levels-of-testing-in-software-testing.webp

thumbnail_levels-of-testing-in-software-testing.webp

levels-of-testing-in-software-testing.webp

What are 4 Levels Of Testing In Software Testing? With Examples

Software testing is always essential and goes along with the software development life cycle (SDLC) to enhance the software product functions and quality. It is assumed as the most important part of developing software products. So why is this important? To give you the best answer, this article will explore the Software Testing Life Cycle (STLC), explaining why it is essential, its key stages, pros and cons, and best practices.
<h2 dir="ltr" style="text-align: justify;">What is the Software Testing Life Cycle (STLC)?</h2>
The Software Testing Life Cycle (STLC) is a strategic process model that guides software testers through all development phases. STLC follows a structured approach to detect and correct bugs, which ensures the high quality of software products.&nbsp;
STLC operates naturally through all stages of&nbsp;<a href="https://reliasoftware.com/blog/software-development-life-cycle-sdlc">Software Development Life Cycle (SDLC)</a> procedures from initial concept to deployment. It focuses on testing components and modules in software development to ensure the quality before reaching end users. The STLC is frequently divided into six separate phases that set specific deliverables together with defined goals.
<h2 dir="ltr">6 Software Testing Life Cycle Phases</h2>
<h3 dir="ltr">Phase 1: Requirement Analysis</h3>
The first testing phase starts with the fundamental preparation which can lead to successful testing. The testers will evaluate the requirements to understand how the software functions and behaves during operation. All requirements are categorized into two main categories:
<ul>
<li dir="ltr" style="text-align: justify;">Functional Requirements: Define what tasks a software should perform (e.g., login capabilities, data processing).</li>
<li dir="ltr" style="text-align: justify;" role="presentation">Non-functional Requirements: Address performance expectations (speed, scalability), usability, compatibility, etc.</li>
</ul>
&gt;&gt;&nbsp;Read more: <a href="https://reliasoftware.com/blog/difference-between-functional-and-non-functional-testing">Differences Between Functional and Non-Functional Testing</a>
Identifying product requirements helps testers create effective test cases to check how the system works. Some testing methods like black-box and white-box help find potential risks and issues early in this phase.
<h3 dir="ltr" style="text-align: justify;">Phase 2: Test Planning</h3>
Once the requirements are clear, the next step is to&nbsp;<a href="https://reliasoftware.com/blog/test-plan-in-software-testing">create a test plan</a>. This plan describes every stage of the testing process from start to finish, specifically:
<ul style="text-align: justify;">
<li dir="ltr" role="presentation">Testing Scope: Specifying which functionalities will be tested and which may be excluded.</li>
<li dir="ltr" role="presentation">Testing Levels: Choosing the <a href="https://reliasoftware.com/blog/levels-of-testing-in-software-testing">levels of testing</a> to undertake (unit test, <a href="https://reliasoftware.com/blog/integration-testing">integration test</a>, system test, and acceptance test).</li>
<li dir="ltr" role="presentation">Testing Resource: Estimating testing resources such as manpower, tools, and hardware.</li>
<li dir="ltr" role="presentation">Risk Management:&nbsp; Identifying potential risks and developing mitigation solutions.</li>
<li dir="ltr" role="presentation">Defect Reporting and Tracking: Setting up a system for reporting and tracking defects during the testing process.</li>
</ul>
A properly defined test strategy allows testing activities to maintain focus while operating efficiently, ensuring to identify all essential details.
<h3 dir="ltr" style="text-align: justify;">Phase 3: Test Case Development</h3>
The testers develop test cases based on the test plan and requirements. The instructions provide all step-by-step procedures, success, and failure criteria for upcoming tests. They also specify how tests should be executed. They can be classified as:
<ul style="text-align: justify;">
<li dir="ltr" role="presentation"><a href="https://reliasoftware.com/blog/functional-testing">Functional Test</a> Cases: Determine whether specific functionality works as planned.</li>
<li dir="ltr" role="presentation"><a href="https://reliasoftware.com/blog/non-functional-testing">Non-functional Test</a> Cases: Evaluate performance, usability, security, etc.</li>
</ul>
The quality of test cases has a substantial impact on the overall success of the testing process. Well-designed test cases ensure that every feature and weakness within the software is covered.
<h3 dir="ltr" style="text-align: justify;">Phase 4: Test Environment Setup</h3>
Before executing the test cases, a testing environment is carefully built up. This environment simulates the real-world situations in which the software will be utilized. It includes:
<ul style="text-align: justify;">
<li dir="ltr" role="presentation">Hardware and Software Setup: Involves setting up the required hardware and software platforms for testing.</li>
<li dir="ltr" role="presentation">Data Preparation: Requires generating sample data sets that reflect real-world scenarios.</li>
</ul>
A well-configured testing environment guarantees that tests are run in a realistic setting, reducing the likelihood of meeting production-specific difficulties later. Configuration management tools can be crucial for maintaining a stable and consistent testing environment.
<h3 dir="ltr" style="text-align: justify;">Phase 5: Test Execution</h3>
This phase is critical for discovering defects and verifying that the product works as planned. Testers carefully execute the created test cases by strictly adhering to the instructions. Generally, this step involves comparing the software&rsquo;s actual behavior to the expected outcome, and any differences are classified as bugs.
The Test Execution Phase includes:
<ul style="text-align: justify;">
<li dir="ltr" role="presentation"><a href="https://reliasoftware.com/blog/what-is-unit-testing">Unit testing</a>: Testing individual software units (such as functions and modules).</li>
<li dir="ltr" role="presentation">Integration testing: Determining how distinct components interact with one another.</li>
<li dir="ltr" role="presentation">System testing: Testing the overall software system.</li>
<li dir="ltr" role="presentation">Acceptance testing: Testing <a href="https://reliasoftware.com/blog/ux-design-process">the user experience</a> when end-users interact with the software.</li>
</ul>
<h3 dir="ltr" style="text-align: justify;">Phase 6: Test Cycle Closure</h3>
This final phase guarantees that the testing effort is well documented and facilitates informed decisions to produce a high-quality software product. This step involves:
<ul>
<li dir="ltr" style="text-align: justify;" role="presentation">Defect Analysis and Reporting: Identifying faults, prioritizing them depending on severity (critical, major, minor), and reporting them to developers for resolution.</li>
<li dir="ltr" style="text-align: justify;" role="presentation">Test Result Reporting: Creating a detailed report that summarises the testing process, findings, and overall program quality.</li>
<li dir="ltr" style="text-align: justify;" role="presentation">Test Closure Meeting: Discussing testing results with stakeholders and determining the next actions based on the findings. This might involve regression testing to ensure fixed bugs don't reappear in subsequent releases.</li>
</ul>
<figure class="image align-center"><img src="https://api.reliasoftware.com/uploads/software_testing_life_cycle_phases_cff0176576.webp" alt="Software Testing Life Cycle Phases" width="661" height="397">
<figcaption contenteditable="true">Software Testing Life Cycle Phases</figcaption>
</figure>
<h2 dir="ltr" style="text-align: justify;">Benefits of Software Testing Life Cycle</h2>
<h3 dir="ltr" style="text-align: justify;">Enhanced Software Quality</h3>
STLC prioritizes identifying and correcting flaws early to prevent them from becoming serious difficulties. This also helps to reduce end-user faults, making software more stable and reliable.
<h3 dir="ltr" style="text-align: justify;">Reduced Development Costs</h3>
Catching issues early in development is far cheaper than repairing them later. STLC reduces post-deployment rework and speeds up time-to-market by preventing major issues from delaying releases.
<h3 dir="ltr" style="text-align: justify;">Improved User Satisfaction</h3>
STLC ensures user satisfaction by delivering high-quality software with fewer problems, and a stable, user-friendly experience. This can lead to increased user happiness and loyalty, which is likely to promote your program and boost your brand reputation.
<h3 dir="ltr" style="text-align: justify;">Early Risk Mitigation</h3>
STLC finds flaws and dangers early in development by proactively analyzing requirements and arranging testing. These early risk mitigation measures reduce development delays.
<h3 dir="ltr" style="text-align: justify;">Increased Efficiency Development</h3>
A clear STLC guides testing through specific objectives, test cases, and procedures. This simplifies development by reducing confusion and rework.
<h3 dir="ltr" style="text-align: justify;">Improved Communication and Collaboration</h3>
STLC fosters better communication and collaboration between testers, developers, and other stakeholders. Regular testing feedback loops keep everyone informed about identified issues and their resolutions. This collaborative environment promotes a shared understanding of the project goals and ensures everyone works towards delivering a high-quality software product.
<h2 dir="ltr" style="text-align: justify;">STLC Challenges and Solutions</h2>
<h3 dir="ltr" style="text-align: justify;">Resource Constraints</h3>
Testing needs <a href="https://reliasoftware.com/blog/how-to-become-a-full-stack-developer">skilled developers</a>, specialized equipment, and time set. When these resources are limited, it can be hard to carry out a full STLC.
Solution:
<ul style="text-align: justify;">
<li dir="ltr" role="presentation">Prioritize testing essential features and user journeys.</li>
<li dir="ltr" role="presentation">Use automation techniques to streamline repetitive testing processes and free up resources for complicated testing.</li>
<li dir="ltr" role="presentation"><a href="https://reliasoftware.com/blog/software-testing-outsourcing">Outsource specific testing activities</a> to supplement internal resources.</li>
</ul>
<h3 dir="ltr" style="text-align: justify;">Defect Management Challenge</h3>
Efficiently identifying, managing, and tracking bugs are crucial for a successful remediation.
Solution:
<ul style="text-align: justify;">
<li dir="ltr" role="presentation">Track, prioritize, and assign defects to developers for resolution by using defect tracking systems.</li>
<li dir="ltr" role="presentation">Create a clear, consistent bug-reporting format.</li>
<li dir="ltr" role="presentation">Keep testers and developers informed about defect reports, remedies, and any follow-up actions required.</li>
</ul>
<h3 dir="ltr" style="text-align: justify;">Testing Complex Systems</h3>
Modern software systems can be intricate with interconnected components. Testing the functionality and compatibility of these complex systems can be a daunting task.
Solution:
<ul style="text-align: justify;">
<li dir="ltr" role="presentation">Break down the system into smaller, more manageable modules. Test each module of the system separately.</li>
<li dir="ltr" role="presentation">Use well-defined integration testing methodologies to verify module compatibility.</li>
<li dir="ltr" role="presentation">Use complicated system testing tools that can handle the complexities of modern software architectures.</li>
</ul>
<h3 dir="ltr" style="text-align: justify;">Keeping Up with Technology Advancements</h3>
The software development landscape is constantly evolving. Testers need to stay updated with emerging technologies and testing methodologies.
Solution:
<ul style="text-align: justify;">
<li dir="ltr" role="presentation">Encourage testers to attend workshops and training programs to keep current.</li>
<li dir="ltr" role="presentation">Keep up with industry best practices and new testing tools by ongoing research.</li>
</ul>
<h2 dir="ltr" style="text-align: justify;">Best Practices for Software Testing Life Cycle</h2>
<ul style="text-align: justify;">
<li dir="ltr" role="presentation">Test Early and Often: Include testing throughout the development process, not just at the end.</li>
<li dir="ltr" role="presentation">Automate the Ordinary: Use automation tools to streamline repetitive testing tasks and free up your testing resources to focus on complex scenarios&nbsp;</li>
<li dir="ltr" role="presentation">Document Everything: Keep clear records of requirements, test plans, cases, and defect reports for better communication, knowledge transfer, and repeatability.</li>
<li dir="ltr" role="presentation">Continuous Improvement: Monitor the effectiveness of STLC regularly and adjust your approach based on results.</li>
<li dir="ltr" role="presentation">Invest in Testers: Equip your team with the latest testing knowledge and skills by providing opportunities for training and professional development.</li>
<li dir="ltr" role="presentation">Prioritize Risks: Focus your testing efforts on the areas with the highest potential impact.</li>
<li dir="ltr" role="presentation">Collaborate and Engage: Encourage open communication among testers, developers, and stakeholders to make the working process smooth during testing.</li>
<li dir="ltr" role="presentation">Effective Change Management: Adapt testing to accommodate evolving features and functionalities.</li>
<li dir="ltr" role="presentation">Track and Analyse: Gather and analyze test metrics to pinpoint areas for improvement.</li>
</ul>
&gt;&gt; Read more:
<ul style="text-align: justify;">
<li dir="ltr" role="presentation">Detailed Explanation of 7 <a href="https://reliasoftware.com/blog/software-testing-principles">Software Testing Principles</a></li>
<li dir="ltr" role="presentation">What is <a href="https://reliasoftware.com/blog/security-testing-in-software-testing">Security Testing in Software Testing</a>?</li>
<li dir="ltr" role="presentation"><a href="https://reliasoftware.com/blog/ai-in-software-testing">AI in Software Testing</a>: How It Works, Benefits &amp; Challenges</li>
<li><a class="blog_post__u0IVW" href="https://reliasoftware.com/blog/difference-between-verification-and-validation">Difference between Verification and Validation in Software Testing</a></li>
</ul>
<h2 style="text-align: justify;">Conclusion</h2>
Software Testing Life Cycle (STLC) has to be linked with the software development life cycle (SDLC) to spot errors early on, optimize resources, increase communication, ensure a smooth workflow, and improve software quality. This alignment ensures thorough testing at each development phase, resulting in high-quality software that fulfills user expectations.
&gt;&gt;&gt; Follow and Contact <a href="https://reliasoftware.com/">Relia Software</a> for more information!

The Software Testing Life Cycle (STLC) is a strategic roadmap that guides testers throughout the development process to guarantee high-quality software.

A Comprehensive Guide to Software Testing Life Cycle (STLC)

large_software-testing-life-cycle.webp

medium_software-testing-life-cycle.webp

small_software-testing-life-cycle.webp

thumbnail_software-testing-life-cycle.webp

software-testing-life-cycle.webp

Software Testing Life Cycle (STLC): Phases and Best Practices

A test plan in software testing is a thorough document that specifies the testing goals, techniques, processes, and resources for a software testing project.

How to Write A Powerful Test Plan in Software Testing? | Relia Software

How to Write A Powerful Test Plan in Software Testing?

large_test-plan-in-software-testing.webp

medium_test-plan-in-software-testing.webp

small_test-plan-in-software-testing.webp

thumbnail_test-plan-in-software-testing.webp

test-plan-in-software-testing.webp

Software testing is the process of implementing software or an application to detect defects or bugs. It evaluates software based on system specs and user requirements. The <a href="https://reliasoftware.com/blog/software-development-life-cycle-sdlc">software development life cycle (SDLC)</a> includes software testing at every stage. It can also be done in program modules.
To test an application or software, you must adhere to certain rules to ensure that your product is free of flaws. This also allows test engineers to test the software with less work and time. Let&rsquo;s explore 7 software testing principles that you should remember in this blog. Check it out!
&gt;&gt; Read more:
<ul>
<li dir="ltr" role="presentation"><a href="https://reliasoftware.com/blog/automation-testing-functions-tools-cost-and-benefits">What is Automation Testing in Software Development</a>?</li>
<li dir="ltr" role="presentation"><a href="https://reliasoftware.com/blog/what-is-end-to-end-testing">End-To-End Testing</a>: Definition &amp; Best Practices</li>
<li><a href="https://reliasoftware.com/blog/difference-between-functional-and-non-functional-testing">Differences Between Functional and Non-Functional Testing</a></li>
</ul>
<h2 dir="ltr">Principle 1: Testing Shows the Presence of Defects</h2>
The first principle of software testing is to help uncover bugs and errors in the software, but not to fix them. These bugs can cause unexpected behavior, incorrect calculations, security vulnerabilities, and slow performance. So, they must be found and reported early in development by testers. Developers can fix them before releasing the software. Early bug fixes are faster and cheaper.
Testers just focus on identifying issues objectively, while developers use their code knowledge to diagnose and fix them. This clear separation of duties ensures efficient testing and reduces potential conflicts within the development team.
Example:
A tester has a shopping cart glitch on an e-commerce website during testing. The tester thoroughly details how to reproduce the bug and intended behavior in the bug report. This report enables the software developer to check the code and fix the issue. To confirm bug correction, tester retests functionality. 
<figure class="image align-center"><img src="https://api.reliasoftware.com/uploads/testing_shows_the_presence_of_defects_c8fbd76646.webp" alt="Testing Shows the Presence of Defects" width="657" height="394">
<figcaption>Testing Shows the Presence of Defects (Source: Canva)</figcaption>
</figure>
<h2 dir="ltr">Principle 2: Exhaustive Testing Is Impossible</h2>
This principle recognizes that exhaustive testing is impossible in software testing. Instead, it stresses prioritizing and testing high-risk regions.
Risk-based testing applies to critical software functions, user interactions, and failure spots identified in these methodologies. Testers can prioritize and build test cases for the most vulnerable locations. This method optimizes testing resource allocation and efficiency.
Example:
E-commerce websites&rsquo; secure payment processing and user identification are high-risk. Testing these areas requires more effort and money for complex test cases. Simulating user logins and testing credit card payment methods may uncover security vulnerabilities. Lower-risk services like product descriptions may be checked less.
<h2 dir="ltr">Principle 3: Early Testing&nbsp;</h2>
Priority should be given to software testing. It should begin early in software development and continue throughout the development lifecycle, from requirements gathering to deployment and beyond.
Early and ongoing testing is cheaper and easier than later phases. It also ensures that the program meets user needs and identifies issues to solve before they become serious issues. Continuous testing will make the final product more stable and reliable.
Example:
Imagine that you develop an e-commerce site. During requirements gathering, testers can apply mockups and <a href="https://reliasoftware.com/blog/proof-of-concept-vs-prototype">prototypes</a> to analyze user stories, highlight places where functions may not satisfy user needs, and confirm the design meets expectations.&nbsp;
As development continues, testers can create <a href="https://reliasoftware.com/blog/what-is-unit-testing">unit testing</a> to check individual functions and <a href="https://reliasoftware.com/blog/integration-testing">integration tests</a> to ensure component compatibility.
<figure class="image align-center"><img src="https://api.reliasoftware.com/uploads/early_testing_88614ca8da.webp" alt="Principle 3: Early Testing&nbsp;" width="660" height="396">
<figcaption>Principle 3: Early Testing (Source: Canva)</figcaption>
</figure>
&gt;&gt; Read more: <a href="https://reliasoftware.com/blog/v-model">V Model in Software Development</a>: The model that prioritizes early testing
<h2 dir="ltr">Principle 4: Defect Clustering</h2>
This software testing principle emphasizes simplifying difficult problems into test cases. Granular test cases should be well-defined and target a specific program behavior. This also increases testing accuracy by isolating functionality and finding failure sources.
Example:
E-commerce checkout is complicated. Testers can divide the checkout cycle into smaller, more focused test cases instead of one huge one. Individual test cases may be validated as address entry, payment method selection, or order confirmation. A more granular methodology enables more precise testing and faster checkout issue identification.
<figure class="image align-center"><img src="https://api.reliasoftware.com/uploads/defect_clustering_b67c06d56d.webp" alt="Principle 4: Defect Clustering" width="654" height="393">
<figcaption>Principle 4: Defect Clustering (Source: Canva)</figcaption>
</figure>
<h2 dir="ltr">Principle 5: Pesticide Paradox</h2>
Pesticide Paradox compares software testing to agricultural pesticide use. The paradox describes the ineffectiveness of using the same tests throughout time. The paradox occurs when testing teams use the same tests without adapting or diversifying.
Just as pests develop resistance to pesticides over time, software can become accustomed to the same test cases. These tests become less effective at finding new vulnerabilities as the software evolves. They may find fewer faults, making the software more vulnerable to other defects.
To avoid the "Pesticide Paradox," testing teams must adapt to changes. This needs analyzing and upgrading test cases, adding new testing methods, and considering alternative testing viewpoints.
Example:
A mobile app test suite has been operating for several months, with no new bugs discovered. The team examines and updates the test cases, introducing new ones that address various usage scenarios and edge cases. As a result, they uncover previously unnoticed flaws.
<h2 dir="ltr">Principle 6: Test Cases Should Be Independent</h2>
Writing independent, self-contained test cases is essential, according to this principle. Because independent tests are not reliant on the results of other tests or conditions, they greatly simplify testing and debugging.
If a test fails, it&rsquo;s easier to detect the issue because it isn&rsquo;t connected to other tests. Independent tests also support parallel testing, allowing multiple tests to run at the same time, which helps save time.
Example:
Imagine <a href="https://reliasoftware.com/blog/tips-for-successful-e-commerce-website-design">a well-designed e-commerce platform</a>. A test case for valid user login should run independently. Whether account registration has been tested or not, the login test should be run at any time. If the login test fails, it's easy to find the fault in the login process since it's independent. 
<h2 dir="ltr">Principle 7: Absence of Errors Fallacy</h2>
This principle highlights the importance of retesting after bug fixes. Just because a bug is reported as fixed doesn't necessarily mean it's truly resolved. Rigorous retesting is essential to ensure the fix works as intended and to prevent regressions (the re-introduction of bugs).
Example:
The tester reruns the test case after <a href="https://reliasoftware.com/blog/ecommerce-web-developer">the e-commerce web developer</a> addresses the shopping cart bug. After adding the items to the basket, checkout, and checking the total, the shopping cart should calculate appropriately. If the retest passes, the fix works. If the retest fails, the fix may be inadequate or generate a regression bug, requiring further study.
&gt;&gt; Read more:&nbsp;
<ul>
<li dir="ltr" role="presentation"><a href="https://reliasoftware.com/blog/ai-in-software-testing">AI in Software Testing</a>: How It Works, Benefits &amp; Challenges</li>
<li dir="ltr" role="presentation">Top 10 <a href="https://reliasoftware.com/blog/end-to-end-testing-tool-and-frameworks">Best End-to-End Testing Tools and Frameworks</a></li>
<li dir="ltr" role="presentation">Top 6 <a href="https://reliasoftware.com/blog/top-automation-testing-tools">Automation Testing Tools for Businesses</a></li>
<li dir="ltr" role="presentation"><a href="https://reliasoftware.com/blog/manual-testing-vs-automation-testing">Manual Testing vs Automation Testing</a>: Which is Better?</li>
</ul>
<h2>Conclusion</h2>
These software testing principles can help you test more efficiently, focus, and improve your testing strategy. Combining all these principles lets you maximize efficiency by efficiently using your time and efforts.
If you are looking for a software testing service, Relia Software can help! <a href="https://reliasoftware.com/services/software-quality-assurance-and-testing-services">Relia Software's Software QA &amp; Testing Services</a> have consistently produced high-quality apps. Our highly skilled QA specialists understand industry best practices and cutting-edge testing methods to give solid, bug-free software that surpasses customer expectations.&nbsp;
&gt;&gt;&gt; Follow and Contact <a href="https://reliasoftware.com/">Relia Software</a> for more information!

7 software testing principles are: 1. Testing shows the presence of defects; 2. Exhaustive testing is impossible; 3. Early testing; 4. Defect clustering, etc.

Detailed Explanation of 7 Software Testing Principles | Relia Software

Detailed Explanation of 7 Software Testing Principles

large_software-testing-principles.webp

medium_software-testing-principles.webp

small_software-testing-principles.webp

thumbnail_software-testing-principles.webp

software-testing-principles.webp

In today's digital world, where sensitive data is stored in software, security is essential in software development. In this blog, we'll explain how security testing integrates seamlessly with software testing, using clear examples to demonstrate its importance. Understanding security testing helps you develop more secure products.&nbsp;
<h2 dir="ltr">What is Security Testing?&nbsp;&nbsp;</h2>
Security testing is a critical component of software development that identifies and addresses security vulnerabilities in software applications. It seeks to protect the software against malicious attacks, unauthorized access, and data breaches.
Security testing ensures software meets security standards. Moreover, it involves analyzing security features and methods and conducting penetration tests to detect flaws and vulnerabilities that hostile actors could exploit.
The purpose of security testing is to detect security vulnerabilities and make recommendations for remediation to improve the software program's overall security. Testers simulate real-world attacks to validate existing security systems, identify and fix weaknesses, preventing attacks before they happen.
<figure class="image align-center"><img style="display: block; margin-left: auto; margin-right: auto;" src="https://api.reliasoftware.com/uploads/security_testing_definition_0ee2407af8.webp" alt="security testing definition" width="597" height="338">
<figcaption>What is Security Testing? (Source: Internet)</figcaption>
</figure>
<h2 dir="ltr">Types of Security Testing in Software Testing</h2>
<h3 dir="ltr">Data Flow Analysis</h3>
Data flow analysis identifies program weaknesses in security testing. It detects uninitialized variables, data validation errors, and leaks. Early discovery of security vulnerabilities makes the software more secure and robust. Data flow analysis can be complicated, but when used with other methods, it can help security testers.
&gt;&gt; Read more: Top 14 Best <a href="https://reliasoftware.com/blog/data-security-software">Data Security Software For Your Businesses</a>
<h3 dir="ltr">Penetration Testing (Pen Testing)</h3>
Penetration testing involves ethical hackers or security specialists to simulate a real-world attack on a system or app. Penetration testing assesses a system or app's security, resilience, and resistance to various attacks. Penetration testing can be done manually or with tools. It can improve your security and provide you with advice.
<h3 dir="ltr">Vulnerability Scanning</h3>
Computer programs search for vulnerabilities in a system or app during vulnerability scanning. Security flaws like obsolete software, misconfigurations, missing updates, and open ports can be found by vulnerability screening. Daily or as needed, it can provide reports and ideas for fixing or reducing vulnerabilities.
<h3 dir="ltr">Static analysis</h3>
Security testing using static analysis examines the system or application's source or binary code without executing it. Static analysis can find code mistakes, defects, vulnerabilities, and quality concerns that could compromise system or <a href="https://reliasoftware.com/blog/an-in-depth-guide-to-web-application-security-for-businesses">application security</a>. Static analysis can check code against specified rules or standards at any step of development using tools or manual reviews.
<h3 dir="ltr">Dynamic analysis</h3>
Dynamic security testing examines a system or application's behavior or performance while running. Dynamic analysis can find runtime faults, memory leaks, resource consumption, and functional concerns that could jeopardize system, application security or reliability. Dynamic analysis can collect and analyze data using tools or manual observation during testing, debugging, or monitoring.
<h3 dir="ltr">Risk assessment</h3>
Risk assessment is a sort of security testing that assesses system or application threats and their likelihood and impact. Risk assessment helps prioritize and classify security issues and establish the best controls to reduce or eliminate them. Risk assessment can be done before, during, or after software development or deployment using frameworks or approaches.
<h3 dir="ltr">Compliance testing</h3>
Security testing that checks if a system or application follows local laws, regulations, standards, or policies is called compliance testing. Compliance testing can verify that the system or application meets security, privacy, quality, and performance standards. Audits, certifications, and accreditations might employ checklists or tools to test compliance.
<figure class="image align-center"><img style="display: block; margin-left: auto; margin-right: auto;" src="https://api.reliasoftware.com/uploads/types_of_security_testing_8a24b08545.webp" alt="types of security testing" width="606" height="341">
<figcaption>Types of Security Testing in Software Testing (Source: Internet)</figcaption>
</figure>
<h2 dir="ltr">Why is Security Testing Important?</h2>
Security testing is crucial for many reasons as below:
<ul>
<li dir="ltr" aria-level="1">
Protects Sensitive Data: Security testing helps to secure personal and sensitive information from unauthorized access, disclosure, or theft.
</li>
<li dir="ltr" aria-level="1">
Prevents Security Breaches: By proactively discovering vulnerabilities in your system, security testing prevents breaches before they happen.
</li>
<li dir="ltr" aria-level="1">
Maintains Trust: Security testing contributes to the trust of customers, clients, and users by demonstrating that the system is secure and that their information is safe.
</li>
<li dir="ltr" aria-level="1">
Meets Compliance Criteria: Many industries have regulations mandating specific security measures (e.g., HIPAA in healthcare). Security testing ensures your system meets these requirements.
</li>
<li dir="ltr" aria-level="1">
Improves System Dependability: Security vulnerabilities can sometimes lead to system crashes or malfunctions. Security testing helps identify and fix these issues, boosting overall system reliability.
</li>
</ul>
In short, security testing is an investment that safeguards your data, strengthens trust, ensures compliance, and improves system reliability, ultimately saving you time, money, and reputation.
<h2 dir="ltr">How To Do The Security Testing in Software Testing?</h2>
<h3 dir="ltr">Step 1: Ensuring Security Right Away</h3>
Consider security testing as soon as <a href="https://reliasoftware.com/blog/software-development-life-cycle-sdlc">the development cycle</a> is started. Vulnerabilities can be found and fixed early on by integrating security testing into each step of the SDLC. This proactive approach saves time and resources compared to fixing critical issues later.&nbsp;
&gt;&gt; Read more: <a href="https://reliasoftware.com/blog/devsecops-integrating-security-into-devops">4 Steps To Integrate Security into DevOps</a>
<h3 dir="ltr">Step 2: Identifying Your Security Targets&nbsp;</h3>
It's important to understand the exact requirements of your program before diving in. Examine industry rules, relevant security policies, and the application&rsquo;s risk profile. This assists in identifying the most important security needs so that you can focus your testing efforts on addressing those particular threats.
<h3 dir="ltr">Step 3: Selecting the Appropriate Security Tools/Techniques</h3>
When it comes to security testing, there is no one-fit-all solution. Different strategies work well at different phases and reveal specific weaknesses. By carefully choosing the appropriate security types, you may guarantee a thorough security evaluation of your software.
<h3 dir="ltr">Step 4: Starting Security Software Testing</h3>
It's time to put your preferred security testing techniques to use! The details will change based on your approach. This could be employing DAST tools to analyze the application during runtime, manually imitating attacker behavior in pen testing, or executing automated tools like SAST scanners.
<h3 dir="ltr">Step 5: Analyzing the Threat Environment</h3>
After the tests are finished, carefully examine the outcomes. Determine which vulnerabilities are most serious and easily exploited, then rank them accordingly. Setting priorities well enables you to address the most serious threats first.
<h3 dir="ltr">Step 6: Strengthening Your Barriers</h3>
Now that vulnerabilities have been found, a repair strategy needs to be created. Depending on your findings, this can entail applying security updates, repairing code issues, or changing system parameters. Recall that maintaining security is a continuous effort. Retest the application after applying fixes to make sure that vulnerabilities are fixed and to confirm the efficacy of your work.
<figure class="image align-center"><img style="display: block; margin-left: auto; margin-right: auto;" src="https://api.reliasoftware.com/uploads/security_testing_procedures_1dbd68d87b.webp" alt="security testing procedures" width="650" height="340">
<figcaption>The progress of Security Testing in Software Testing (Source: Internet)</figcaption>
</figure>
<h2 dir="ltr">Use Cases of Security Testing in Software Testing</h2>
<h3 dir="ltr">Test Case 1: Validating Input - Password and Username</h3>
This test case is designed to confirm how the application responds to incorrect user input when a user logs in.
Steps in the Test:
<ul>
<li dir="ltr" aria-level="1">
Type a blank password or username.
</li>
<li dir="ltr" aria-level="1">
Enter a username that contains special characters that the system does not support.
</li>
<li dir="ltr" aria-level="1">
Enter a username or password that is excessively long (more characters than necessary).
</li>
</ul>
Anticipated Outcome: The software ought to provide unambiguous error notifications pinpointing the precise validation problem (such as "Username cannot be empty," "Special characters are not allowed," or "Password surpasses maximum length").
<h3 dir="ltr">Test Case 2: Safe Session Administration</h3>
This test case is designed to confirm whether the program securely manages user sessions.
Steps in the Test:
<ul>
<li dir="ltr" aria-level="1">
Open the application, log in, and maintain the open session.
</li>
<li dir="ltr" aria-level="1">
Launch the application in a new window of your browser and try to get to a page that is personal to you.
</li>
</ul>
Anticipated Outcome: In the new window, the program ought to prevent access to user-specific pages in the absence of valid authentication. This could entail requesting a session refresh or another login prompt.
<h3 dir="ltr">Test Case 3: Simulation of A Password-Guessing Attack</h3>
This test scenario mimics a Password-guessing attack, in which an attacker tries a variety of combinations in an attempt to guess the login credentials.
Step in the Test:
Make a script or utilize an automated tool to try different identities and popular password combinations for login attempts.
Anticipated Outcome: The program ought to incorporate features that restrict login attempts following a certain quantity of unsuccessful tries. This could entail requesting extra authentication (like a CAPTCHA) or temporarily locking the account.
<figure class="image align-center"><img style="display: block; margin-left: auto; margin-right: auto;" src="https://api.reliasoftware.com/uploads/security_testing_example_cases_cc325116db.webp" alt="security testing example cases" width="630" height="273">
<figcaption>Security Testing Use Cases (Source: Internet)</figcaption>
</figure>
&gt;&gt; Read more: 
<ul>
<li dir="ltr"><a href="https://reliasoftware.com/blog/5-best-practices-for-enhancing-ci-cd-pipeline-security">Best Practices for Enhancing CI/CD Pipeline Security</a></li>
<li dir="ltr">Mastering <a href="https://reliasoftware.com/blog/functional-testing">Functional Testing for Delivering Bug-Free Software</a></li>
</ul>
<h2 dir="ltr">Conclusion</h2>
Security testing in software testing is critical for an application since it determines whether secret data remains confidential. In this sort of testing, the tester takes on the role of an attacker and explores the system to discover security flaws. Security testing is crucial in software development to secure data at all costs.
&gt;&gt;&gt; Follow and Contact <a href="https://reliasoftware.com/">Relia Software</a> for more information!

Security testing in software testing is a critical component of software development that identifies and addresses security vulnerabilities in software applications

What is Security Testing in Software Testing? Types & Examples | Relia Software

large_security-testing-in-software-testing.webp

medium_security-testing-in-software-testing.webp

small_security-testing-in-software-testing.webp

thumbnail_security-testing-in-software-testing.webp

security-testing-in-software-testing.webp

What is Security Testing in Software Testing? Types & Examples

If you're a software engineer, you've probably heard the term "unit testing" at some time in your career. These tests help to ensure that the code is functioning properly and discover any mistakes or flaws. But what precisely is it, and how does it function?&nbsp;
In this blog post, we'll go over the significance of this type of testing, how it works, the benefits it provides, and the basic steps for using it. Whether you're new to testing or want to improve your understanding of this vital topic, this piece has something for you. So, let's get started!
&gt;&gt; Read more: Exploring The <a href="https://reliasoftware.com/blog/importance-of-software-testing">Importance Of Software Testing</a>
<h2 dir="ltr">What is Unit Testing?</h2>
Unit testing is a core software development method that isolates and tests individual code pieces. But what constitutes a "unit" in this context? In software development, a unit can refer to various granular components that execute certain functions. This could be a function, a method within a class, a module, or any other well-defined code that can be tested logically and independently.
By isolating and testing these units independently, developers may validate their operation and uncover problems or unusual behavior early in <a href="https://reliasoftware.com/blog/software-development-life-cycle-sdlc">the software development process</a>. This proactive approach contributes to the overall quality and reliability of the program being created.
&gt;&gt; Read more:
<ul>
<li dir="ltr" role="presentation"><a href="https://reliasoftware.com/blog/automation-testing-functions-tools-cost-and-benefits">What is Automation Testing in Software Development</a>?</li>
<li><a href="https://reliasoftware.com/blog/manual-testing-vs-automation-testing">Manual Testing vs Automation Testing</a>: Which is Better?</li>
<li dir="ltr" role="presentation"><a href="https://reliasoftware.com/blog/what-is-end-to-end-testing">End-To-End Testing</a>: Definition &amp; Best Practices</li>
</ul>
<h2 dir="ltr">Why is Unit Testing Important?&nbsp;</h2>
Improved Code Quality and Fewer Bugs
Unit tests carefully check code units for mistakes and inconsistencies. Unit testing finds and fixes these flaws early on, preventing them from spreading between development phases. This proactive approach produces cleaner, more reliable code.
Saved Time and Resources
Instead of spending hours debugging a complex issue that could have been discovered early, apply unit testing to reduce time significantly. Early identification frees up time and resources for developers to add additional features and functions.
Catching Errors Early
Unit testing helps developers spot and fix bugs before they become bigger difficulties. Early intervention saves time and energy and avoids integration and deployment issues.
Increasing Confidence and Maintainability
Well-written unit tests operate as living code documentation, increasing developer confidence and maintainability. They clarify each unit's behavior and functions, enhancing developer confidence in the codebase. These tests provide a reference point for future code modifications, making them easier and less error-prone.
<figure class="image align-center"><img style="display: block; margin-left: auto; margin-right: auto;" src="https://api.reliasoftware.com/uploads/unit_testing_importance_00664e1099.webp" alt="unit testing importance" width="538" height="327">
<figcaption>Unit Testing Importance (Source: Internet)</figcaption>
</figure>
<h2 dir="ltr">Basic Process of Unit Testing</h2>
Unit testing may seem complicated, however, it may be simplified into a few steps:
<h3 dir="ltr">Step 1: Unit Identification</h3>
Selecting the code unit to test is the first step. This could be a function, class method, module, or other well-defined code with unambiguous functionality. Remember to test these units separately from the codebase.
<h3 dir="ltr">Step 2: Test Case Design</h3>
You must write test cases to examine the unit's functionality completely. These test cases should cover several scenarios, such as:
<ul>
<li dir="ltr" aria-level="1">
Positive test cases check normal unit behavior. A positive test case for a rectangle area function would provide proper dimensions and ensure the method delivers the correct area.
</li>
<li dir="ltr" aria-level="1">
Negative test cases examine how the unit handles invalid or unexpected input. A negative test case for the area calculation function might use negative dimensions and check for an error message.
</li>
</ul>
<h3 dir="ltr">Step 3: Write Unit Tests</h3>
After creating test cases, write code. Unit testing frameworks in most <a href="https://reliasoftware.com/blog/which-web-development-language-should-you-learn">programming languages</a> include tools and functions for writing and running unit tests. These frameworks simplify and standardize testing.
<h3 dir="ltr">Step 4: Test and Assess</h3>
Now it's time to conduct tests and analyze results. It will be good when the tested unit is working properly. Failure of any tests indicates a unit problem. Therefore, unit testing is great because you can find the problem and correct it before it affects other code.&nbsp;
<h3 dir="ltr">Step 5: Refactor and Repeat</h3>
Software development is iterative. As your code changes, you may need to refactor the tested unit. In such circumstances, you must review your unit tests to ensure they still reflect the unit's functionality.&nbsp;&nbsp;
<h3 dir="ltr">Examples</h3>
Now that we've reviewed the unit testing process, let's contextualize it with a real-world application. Consider a simple function that calculates the area of a rectangle using its length and width as inputs. Here's how we could do unit testing for this function:
Identify the unit: In this case, we use the [calculate_area] function to calculate the area of a rectangle depending on its length and breadth.
Develop test cases:
Positive Test Case 1:
<ul>
<li dir="ltr" aria-level="1">
Input: Length = 5; Width = 3 (valid dimensions).
</li>
<li dir="ltr" aria-level="1">
Expected Output: Area = 15 (length x width)
</li>
</ul>
Positive Test Case 2:
<ul>
<li dir="ltr" aria-level="1">
Input: Length = 10; Width = 0 (valid dimensions with zero width)
</li>
<li dir="ltr" aria-level="1">
Expected outputE: Area = 0 (0 x Width).
</li>
</ul>
Negative Test Case:
<ul>
<li dir="ltr" aria-level="1">
Input: Length = -2 and Width = 5 (negative length)
</li>
<li dir="ltr" aria-level="1">
Expected output: Error message indicating invalid input (function should not take negative dimensions).
</li>
</ul>
Write Unit Tests:&nbsp;
<pre class="language-python"><code># Assuming Python and the `unittest` framework

def test_calculate_area_positive_1(self):
 length = 5
 width = 3
 expected_area = length * width
 actual_area = calculate_area(length, width)
 self.assertEqual(actual_area, expected_area)

# Similarly, write test cases for other scenarios
</code></pre>
Test and Assess: Verify that all unit tests pass, confirming that the calculate_area function works. If a test fails, examine the error message to find and fix the function issue.
Refactor and Repeat: Remember, unit testing is ongoing. If you add input value validations to the [calculate_area] function, check your unit tests to make sure they still work.
<h2 dir="ltr">Techniques of Unit Tests&nbsp;</h2>
<h3 dir="ltr">Structural Unit Testing</h3>
Structural testing is a white-box testing approach in which a developer creates test cases based on the internal structure of the code. The strategy entails determining all feasible paths via the code. The tester selects test case inputs, runs them, and decides the correct output.&nbsp;
Primary structural testing methods include:
<ul>
<li dir="ltr" aria-level="1">
Statement, branch, and path testing&mdash;every program statement, branch, or path is tested.&nbsp;
</li>
<li dir="ltr" aria-level="1">
Conditional testing lets developers run code based on value comparisons to decide a test's path.
</li>
<li dir="ltr" aria-level="1">
Expression testing compares the application to different regular expression values.
</li>
</ul>
<figure class="image align-center"><img style="display: block; margin-left: auto; margin-right: auto;" src="https://api.reliasoftware.com/uploads/unit_testing_structural_725c174f9c.webp" alt="unit testing structural" width="519" height="292">
<figcaption>Structural Unit Testing (Source: Internet)</figcaption>
</figure>
<h3 dir="ltr">Functional Unit Testing</h3>
Functional unit testing is a black-box testing method for determining the functionality of an application unit. The primary functional approaches include:
<ul>
<li dir="ltr" aria-level="1">
The size and kind of input objects are tested and compared to equivalence classes.
</li>
<li dir="ltr" aria-level="1">
Boundary value analysis&mdash;tests software's response to inputs beyond boundary values.
</li>
<li dir="ltr" aria-level="1">
Syntax checking&mdash;tests that verify software syntax interpretation.
</li>
<li dir="ltr" aria-level="1">
Equivalent partitioning divides software unit input data into partitions and applies test cases to each segment.
</li>
</ul>
<h3 dir="ltr">Error-based Techniques</h3>
Error-based unit tests should ideally be written by <a href="https://reliasoftware.com/blog/will-ai-replace-software-engineers">the software developers</a> who created the code. They include:
<ul>
<li dir="ltr" aria-level="1">
Fault seeding&mdash;coding known problems and testing till found.
</li>
<li dir="ltr" aria-level="1">
Mutation testing involves modifying source code statements to determine if the test code finds errors. Mutation testing is costly, especially in large applications.
</li>
<li dir="ltr" aria-level="1">
Historical test data&mdash;calculates test case priority using previous executions.
</li>
</ul>
<h2 dir="ltr">Unit Testing Practices</h2>
<h4 dir="ltr">Test-driven Development</h4>
Test Driven Development (TDD) requires programmers to build tests before production code and then write code to pass them. With a little confidence from that initial test, the programmer can rework and refactor to build the cleanest code possible. As with most basic ideas, execution is difficult. TDD needs a distinct mindset and the tenacity to persevere through a slow learning curve.
<h4 dir="ltr">Checking Your Work</h4>
TDD isn't new, but it's largely for developers. The rest are testing and reviewing their work. Although writing unit tests after production code is more traditional, it is still useful. If you've taken maths in the past decade, you know it.
After checking your work and confirming that the code is working as expected, the unit tests change. Simple tests that may be performed with every product build detect unexpected code changes.
<h4 dir="ltr">Documenting Code</h4>
Code documentation is a hassle, as shown by how little is written. Unit testing encourages better development techniques and leaves behind code that describes your product's behavior, making documentation easier. Instead of feeding the documentation with code changes, you'll update a working set of checks.
<figure class="image"><img src="https://api.reliasoftware.com/uploads/unit_testing_practices_cd1ee477ea.webp" alt="unit testing practices" width="554" height="290">
<figcaption>Best Practices of Unit Testing (Source: Internet)</figcaption>
</figure>
&gt;&gt; Read more:
<ul>
<li dir="ltr" style="font-style: italic;" aria-level="1">
<a href="https://reliasoftware.com/blog/guide-for-golang-unit-test">Comprehensive Guide for Golang Unit Test</a>
</li>
<li dir="ltr" style="font-style: italic;" aria-level="1">
<a href="https://reliasoftware.com/blog/react-test-renderer">Mastering React Test Renderer for Streamlined Testing</a>
</li>
<li dir="ltr" style="font-style: italic;" aria-level="1">
<a href="https://reliasoftware.com/blog/ai-in-software-testing">AI in Software Testing</a>: How It Works, Benefits &amp; Challenges
</li>
</ul>
<h2 dir="ltr">Conclusion</h2>
So, in conclusion, what is unit testing? Unit testing is a core software development approach essential to software development and ensures code quality and dependability. You may identify defects early, enhance code maintainability, and gain confidence by writing and running small, isolated tests for each code unit.
To maximize this testing, build tests that cover a wide range of situations and edge cases and run and update them as you make code changes.
&gt;&gt;&gt; Follow and Contact <a href="https://reliasoftware.com/">Relia Software</a> for more information!

Unit testing is a software testing strategy that tests individual code parts. Developers can use this test to find issues early in the development process.